Wren v. Federal Mogul Corp.

The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Garner. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, or amend the Opinion and Award. However, the Full Commission amends the prior Opinion and Award with regard to jurisdiction.

The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law, the following, which were entered into by the parties in a Pre-Trial Agreement and at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS 1. The parties are subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

2. The employer/employee relationship existed between defendant and plaintiff.

3. Defendant is non-insured.

4. Plaintiff alleges an injury by accident or a specific traumatic incident on September 2, 1999, resulting in a hernia.

5. Defendant has denied liability.

6. Plaintiff is seeking medical expenses of $4,200.00 and temporary total disability for three weeks.

7. The issues before the Commission are whether plaintiff's employer employed three or more employees to be subject to the Workers' Compensation Act, and whether plaintiff suffered a specific traumatic incident as alleged.

*********** Based upon the evidence of record and the findings of fact found by the Deputy Commissioner, the Full Commission finds as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT 1. On September 2, 1999, plaintiff was employed by defendant-employer as a Mechanic. In addition to plaintiff, defendant employed only one other employee, Jeff Segman.

2. Plaintiff alleges that Charles Johnson was the third employee employed by defendant. However, Charles Johnson was a volunteer who was not paid. Mr. Johnson was mentally disabled from injuries suffered in automobile accident and was receiving disability payments. Mr. Johnson was allowed to "hang around" but did not perform any duties except for occasional sweeping or making coffee, which he sometimes chose to do. Mr. Johnson was given a uniform shirt by Mr. Jennings who wanted to make Mr. Johnson feel welcome. Mr. Johnson was never given specific work hours.

3. On September 2, 1999, plaintiff claims that he injured his back while employed by defendant-employer. However, plaintiff reported no such injury. Furthermore, plaintiff last worked for defendant-employer on August 27, 1999.

4. Based on plaintiff's testimony at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner and the observations of the Deputy Commissioner, plaintiff's testimony regarding the alleged back injury is not credible.

*********** Based on the foregoing findings of fact, the Full Commission concludes as follows:

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. On September 2, 1999, defendant did not employ three (3) or more regular employees and therefore was not subject to and bound by the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2(l).

2. Having three (3) or more regular employees is a jurisdictional prerequisite. Consequently, since this prerequisite is not met in the instant case, defendant is not subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2.

*********** Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Full Commission adopts and affirms the holding of the Deputy Commissioner and enters the following:

*********** ORDER 1. Plaintiff's claim in this matter must be, and the same is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction.

2. Each side shall pay its own costs.

This the 6th day of September 2001.

S/_______________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/______________ RENE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER

S/_______________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER