The action is to challenge the formation of Seventy-first Consolidated School District in said county. To restrain a proposed bond issue, and the levying of a special tax to provide for same, pursuant to an election held in said district. And also the present location and erection of the school buildings within said district as now planned and intended by the school authorities. On the hearing the court made a full and comprehensive finding of the pertinent facts, and entered judgment in terms as follows:
"1. That the restraining order heretofore issued in this case be and the same is hereby dissolved.
"2. That the election held in that part of the 71st Consolidated School District, excluding Kornbeau, is hereby declared valid and sufficient to authorize, and does authorize, the levying and collection of the special tax as asked for in the petition.
"3. That the election held in the Kornbeau territory is hereby declared valid and sufficient to authorize, and does authorize, the levying and collection of the special tax as asked for in the petition.
"4. That the two said districts were properly consolidated, and now constitute the 71st Consolidated School District.
"5. That the bond election held in the 71st Consolidated District is hereby declared valid, and said bonds a legal and binding obligation when issued upon and against the 71st Consolidated School District, and the property therein.
"And the proper authorities are hereby authorized and directed to take such further steps as may be necessary for the levying of said tax and the issuing of said bonds, and it is further decreed that the defendants go hence without day and recover their costs of the plaintiff and his surety." *Page 268 The facts in evidence as they now appear of record are fully sufficient to support and justify the conclusions of the trial judge. As to the proper formation of the school district in question, the legality of the election and proposed bond issue and tax levy to provide for same, and the lawful selection of the proposed school site as contemplated by the authorities in control of the matter, and the judgment dissolving the injunction must be upheld. But we think his Honor went beyond the powers conferred upon him in undertaking to make a final determination of the rights of the parties, and adjudging that defendants "go without day." Except where the facts are agreed upon or admitted for the purpose, such a judgment in a case of this kind may only be had at the final hearing and on the facts as they may be then fixed and established. This was virtually held in the recent case ofDavenport v. Board of Education, 183 N.C. 570, and the ruling is in accord with the prevailing decisions on the subject. Galloway v. Board ofEducation, ante, 245; Davenport v. Board of Education, supra; Moore v.Monument Co., 166 N.C. 211.
This will be certified that the judgment of the lower court be modified in accordance with this opinion.
Modified.