All the circumstances subsequent to the sale are to be taken into consideration as explanatory of the real state of the *Page 339 precedent transactions — the possession of John always continued; George gave nothing for the horse, though a valuable consideration was pretended and held up. The debtor having used the horse as his own, and disposed of him, are visible marks of fraud.
The jury found for the plaintiff.
See Hodges v. Blount, ante, 414.