There is no error. A master is not liable for the wilful trespass of a servant. He is liable in an "action on the case" for an injury, caused by the negligence, or unskilfulness, of a servant, while doing his business. This is an action of trespass vi et armis. "There was no evidence that the master sanctioned, or even knew of the trespass in question."
PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. *Page 380