OPINION — AG — ** STATE EMPLOYEES — DUAL EMPLOYMENT — DUAL COMPENSATION ** IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE OKLAHOMA CODE OF ETHICS, AND POSSIBLY THE OKLAHOMA BUDGET LAW OF 1947 AND THE OKLAHOMA CRIMINAL CODE AS WELL, FOR A PERSON WHO IS A FULL TIME EMPLOYEE OF ONE STATE AGENCY TO ACCEPT EMPLOYMENT FROM ANOTHER STATE AGENCY WHEN THE HOURS OF WORK FOR BOTH JOBS ARE CONTEMPORANEOUS AND WHEN THE PERSON SO EMPLOYED RECEIVES COMPENSATION FROM BOTH AGENCIES. WHEN A FULL TIME EMPLOYEE OF A STATE AGENCY ACCEPTS EMPLOYMENT ON A TEMPORARY OR OTHER BASIS FROM ANOTHER STATE AGENCIES BEING CONTEMPORANEOUS, AND WHEN THE PERSON SO EMPLOYED RECEIVES COMPENSATION FOR BOTH EMPLOYMENTS, THE STATE ETHICS COMMISSION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE APPLICABILITY OF THE PENALTY PROVISIONS OF THE OKLAHOMA CODE OF ETHICS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY WHERE THE ALLEGED ILLEGALITY ACCURRED IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE APPLICABILITY OF THE OKLAHOMA CRIMINAL CODE, AND THE STATE BUDGET DIRECTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASCERTAINING THE PROPER COURSE OF ACTION REQUIRED BY THE OKLAHOMA BUDGET LAW OF 1947. CITE: 74 Ohio St. 1971 1401 [74-1401], 74 Ohio St. 1971 1404 [74-1404], 74 Ohio St. 1971 1413 [74-1413], 62 Ohio St. 1971 41.17 [62-41.17] 61 Ohio St. 1971 3 [61-3], 74 Ohio St. 1971 284 [74-284], 21 Ohio St. 1971 358 [21-358], 62 Ohio St. 1971 372 [62-372], 21 Ohio St. 1971 359 [21-359], 62 Ohio St. 1971 41.26 [62-41.26] (JAMES R. BARNETT) == SEE: OPINION NO. 88-023 (1989) ** SEE OPINION NO. 91-578 (1991) ** SEE OPINION NO. 91-566 (1991)