Appellant's motion for rehearing only renews the same propositions which were presented and dealt with on original submission. A review of the record has lead to no change in the conclusions expressed in our original opinion. Appellant insists that the evidence does not support the verdict upon the question of an intent to kill. For us to so hold would be arbitrarily ignoring evidence before the jury upon which the verdict could be properly predicated.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.