Appellant was convicted of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors.
The State relied solely upon the testimony of the alleged purchaser of the liquor. He was an accomplice, and in the absence of any corroborating facts, the evidence is insufficient. Franklin v. State, 88 Tex.Crim. Rep., 227 S.W. Rep., 486.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded. *Page 300