United States v. Torres-Avila

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 19, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40527 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. ARMANDO TORRES-AVILA Defendant - Appellant -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:02-CR-819-1 -------------------- ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This court affirmed the judgment of conviction and sentence of Armando Torres-Avila (Torres); the Supreme Court vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). United States v. Torres-Avila, No. 04-40527 (5th Cir. Dec. 16, 2004) (unpublished); vacated by sub nom. De la Cruz-Gonzalez v. United States, 125 S. Ct. 1995 (2005). * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 04-40527 -2- Torres argues that the district court erred by imposing a sentence pursuant to the mandatory federal sentencing guideline system that was held unconstitutional in Booker. Torres fails to meet his burden of showing that the district court’s sentence under guidelines it deemed mandatory affected his substantial rights such that his sentence amounts to plain error. United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo, 407 F.3d 728, 733 (5th Cir. 2005). Because nothing in the Supreme Court’s Booker decision requires us to change our prior affirmance in this case, we reinstate our judgment affirming Torres’s conviction and sentence. AFFIRMED.