Appellant was convicted of robbery, and prosecutes an appeal on the sole ground that the court erred in overruling his motion to quash the indictment, he contending that in one count thereof it undertook to charge two separate and distinct offenses. This contention is not well taken. Green v. State, 66 Tex. Crim. 446, 147 S.W. Rep., 593.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
ON REHEARING. June 25, 1915.