Koreski v. Seattle Hardware Co.

In applicable principle, the instant case is indistinguishable from Farr v. Department of Labor Industries, 125 Wash. 349,216 P. 20. Under the construction placed upon Rem. Rev. Stat., § 7675, in that case, plaintiff here was not a "workman" in contemplation of the act. Therefore, I dissent.

JEFFERS, J., concurs with BLAKE, J.

May 14, 1943. Petition for rehearing denied. *Page 437