United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
In the November 29, 2005
United States Court of Appeals Charles R. Fulbruge III
for the Fifth Circuit Clerk
_______________
m 04-40496
_______________
LARRY BROCK; ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
ALICE HIGGINS; WILLIAM HIGGINS; MIKE HIGGINS ENTERPRISES, INC.;
KATHY PLUNKETT; CHARLES PLUNKETT; BILLY DAN ROLLING;
ADDIE HALL; SCOTT RENEAU; DONNA RENEAU,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
FLAVIO OLIVAREZ,
Plaintiff-
Counter Defendant-
Appellant,
VERSUS
BASKIN-ROBBINS USA, CO.; BASKIN-ROBBINS INC.,
Defendants-
Counter Claimants-
Appellees.
***************
BASKIN-ROBBINS INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
VERSUS
CHARLES RONALD PLUNKETT; KATHY ELIZABETH PLUNKETT,
Defendants-Appellants.
_________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
m 5:01-CV-77
______________________________
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, portions of the record and have heard the ar-
Circuit Judges. guments of counsel. We conclude that the dis-
trict court did not err in deciding that defen-
PER CURIAM:* dants did not commit an actionable breach of
fiduciary duty in administering the fund. Nor
The plaintiffs appeal an adverse judgment, was there error in denying leave to amend or
partially resulting from a summary judgment in the various rulings on discovery or in any
and partially from issues determined after a other aspect of the proceedings that is raised
trial. Plaintiffs claim, inter alia, improper use on appeal.
of monies in and from a trust fund intended for
advertising. The judgment, accordingly, is AFFIRMED.
We have reviewed the briefs and applicable
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has deter-
mined that this opinion should not be published and is
not precedent except under the limited circumstances
set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
2