NUMBER 13-16-00223-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
SHAHIN ZARAIENH, Appellant,
v.
DALE & KLEIN, L.L.P.,
KATIE PEARSON KLEIN,
AND FERNANDO MANCIAS, Appellees.
On appeal from the 92nd District Court
of Hidalgo County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Shahin Zaraienh, filed a notice of appeal of a final judgment rendered
on March 18, 2016 in an attorney’s fee case involving appellees Dale & Klein, L.P., Katie
Pearson Klein, and Fernando Mancias. However, on May 31, 2016, the trial court signed
an order granting a motion for new trial filed by Dale & Klein, L.L.P. On June 8, 2016,
appellee Katie Pierson Klein filed an opposed motion to dismiss this appeal for want of
jurisdiction because, in light of the trial court’s new trial order, there is no final order
subject to appeal in this case. More than ten days have passed and appellant has not
filed a response to the motion to dismiss.
In terms of appellate jurisdiction, appellate courts only have jurisdiction to review
final judgments and certain interlocutory orders identified by statute. See Lehmann v.
Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). An order granting a new trial is an
unappealable, interlocutory order. Fruehauf Corp. v. Carrillo, 848 S.W.2d 83, 84 (Tex.
1993) (per curiam). An order granting a new trial is not subject to review either by direct
appeal from that order, or, as in the instant case, from a final judgment rendered after
further proceedings in the trial court. Cummins v. Paisan Constr. Co., 682 S.W.2d 235,
235 36 (Tex. 1984) (per curiam).
The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion to dismiss, is of the
opinion that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because there is no final appealable
judgment. Accordingly, we GRANT the opposed motion to dismiss and we DISMISS the
appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the
7th day of July, 2016.
2
Shahin Zaraienh v. Dale & Klein, L.P., Katie Pearson Klein, and Fernando Mancias
Combined Opinion