IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ELEANOR DRESDEN, No. 70598
Petitioner,
vs.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK;
AND THE HONORABLE MICHELLE
FILED
LEAVITT, DISTRICT JUDGE, JUL 1 3 2016
Respondents,
TRACIE K. LINDEMAN
and CLERK OF UPREME COURT
ED'S STATIONS INC., A DOMESTIC BY ' CLERK
SDEPUTY
CORPORATION, D/B/A AM PM,
Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR
WRIT OF PROHIBITION OR MANDAMUS
This original petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus
challenges a district court order granting a motion to withdraw an offer of
judgment in a negligence action. Having considered the petition and
supporting documents, we are not persuaded that our intervention is
warranted at this time, as an adequate remedy exists in the form of an
appeal from any adverse final judgment. NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Inel
Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A e L 6-21 SS2
P.3d 556, 558 (2008); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222,
224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED?
Cherry
.2#4611/1
e , J.
, J.
Gibbons
cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge
Moss Berg Injury Lawyers
Law Offices of Elizabeth R. Mikesell
Eighth District Court Clerk
1 In
light of this order, we deny petitioner's request for a stay of the
underlying proceedings.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A ea,
Dresden v. Dist. Ct. (Ed's Stations Inc.)
Combined Opinion