Dresden v. Dist. Ct. (Ed's Stations Inc.)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ELEANOR DRESDEN, No. 70598 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE MICHELLE FILED LEAVITT, DISTRICT JUDGE, JUL 1 3 2016 Respondents, TRACIE K. LINDEMAN and CLERK OF UPREME COURT ED'S STATIONS INC., A DOMESTIC BY ' CLERK SDEPUTY CORPORATION, D/B/A AM PM, Real Party in Interest. ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION OR MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus challenges a district court order granting a motion to withdraw an offer of judgment in a negligence action. Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we are not persuaded that our intervention is warranted at this time, as an adequate remedy exists in the form of an appeal from any adverse final judgment. NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Inel Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A e L 6-21 SS2 P.3d 556, 558 (2008); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED? Cherry .2#4611/1 e , J. , J. Gibbons cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge Moss Berg Injury Lawyers Law Offices of Elizabeth R. Mikesell Eighth District Court Clerk 1 In light of this order, we deny petitioner's request for a stay of the underlying proceedings. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A ea,