UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1227
MICHAEL A. SCOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION; KENNETH E. WILLIAM; STEVEN G.
JACKSON; ELIAS I. VEGA,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 16-1228
MICHAEL A. SCOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:95-cv-00377-RBS; 2:95-cv-00815-RBS)
Submitted: July 19, 2016 Decided: July 27, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael A. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Johnson Webster,
WILLCOX & SAVAGE, PC, Norfolk, Virginia; Roy Barrow Blackwell,
Hunter Wilmer Sims, Jr., KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Norfolk,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Michael A. Scott appeals the
district court’s orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4)
motion and his motion for reconsideration. We grant Scott’s
motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed
the record and affirm for the reasons cited by the district
court. Scott v. Norfolk S. Corp., No. 2:95-cv-00377-RBS; 2:95-
cv-00815-RBS (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2016; Feb. 22, 2016). We deny
the Appellees’ motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3