FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 03 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RODNEY L. PLANT, No. 14-35846
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 1:11-cv-00316-BLW
v.
MEMORANDUM*
KIM SPAULDING; APRIL DAWSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Idaho
B. Lynn Winmill, Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 26, 2016**
Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Rodney L. Plant, a former Idaho state prisoner, appeals pro se from the
district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging
deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Cir. 2004), and we affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendant
Dawson because Plant failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to
whether Dawson was deliberately indifferent in treating Plant after Plant broke his
prosthetic foot. See id. at 1057 (a prison official acts with deliberate indifference
only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to the prisoner’s
health); see also Starr v. Baca, 652 F.3d 1202, 1207 (9th Cir. 2011) (a supervisor
is liable under § 1983 only if he or she is personally involved in the constitutional
deprivation or there is a “sufficient causal connection between the supervisor’s
wrongful conduct and the constitutional violation” (citation and internal quotation
marks omitted)).
We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued
in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on
appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).
AFFIRMED.
2 14-35846