State v. Dist. Ct. (Morgan (Bayzle))

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA THE STATE OF NEVADA, No. 70945 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE AUG 0 8 2016 RICHARD SCOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE, TRACIE K LINDEMAN Respondents, CLERK OF SUPREME COURT and BY DEPUTY CLERK BAYZLE MORGAN, Real Party in Interest. ORDER DENYING PETITION This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order granting real party in interest's request to instruct the jury regarding lesser-related offenses. Having considered the documents on file herein, we conclude that petitioner has failed to demonstrate that our extraordinary intervention is warranted, NRS )(9 -244S-17 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004), and we therefore ORDER the petition DENIED.' J. Cherry J. Douglas cc: Hon. Richard Scotti, District Judge Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney The Law Office of Daniel M. Bunin Dayvid J. Figler Eighth District Court Clerk 'We deny as moot the request for stay and lift the temporary stay entered in this matter on August 4, 2016. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2