Case: 15-11078 Document: 00513638686 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 15-11078 FILED
Conference Calendar August 16, 2016
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
DANTANA TANKSLEY,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:15-CR-38-1
Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Dantana Tanksley raises
arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Alcantar, 733 F.3d 143, 145-
46 (5th Cir. 2013), United States v. Rose, 587 F.3d 695, 705 (5th Cir. 2009), and
United States v. Ford, 509 F.3d 714, 716-17 (5th Cir. 2007). In Alcantar, we
rejected the argument that Nat’l Fed’n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius, 132 S. Ct.
2566 (2012), affected our prior jurisprudence rejecting challenges to the
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 15-11078 Document: 00513638686 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2016
No. 15-11078
constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). 733 F.3d at 145-46. In Rose, we held
that Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009), did not alter the
proof required in a § 922(g)(1) case. 587 F.3d at 705. In Ford, we held that a
Texas conviction for possession with intent to deliver is a “controlled substance
offense.” 509 F.3d at 716-17.
Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is
DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2