Glasheen, Valles and Inderman, LLP v. Ilda Montes, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Karen Herrera Blaies & Hightower, LLP And C. Barry Crutchfield, P.C. D/B/A Templeman & Crutchfield

Summarize
Check Treatment

Related Cases

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-16-00060-CV GLASHEEN, VALLES AND APPELLANT INDERMAN, LLP V. ILDA MONTES, INDIVIDUALLY APPELLEES AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF KAREN HERRERA; BLAIES & HIGHTOWER, LLP; AND C. BARRY CRUTCHFIELD, P.C. D/B/A TEMPLEMAN & CRUTCHFIELD ------------ FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 352-263554-13 ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------ 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. We have considered appellant’s agreed “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d). PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ. DELIVERED: August 18, 2016 2