Rancosky v. Washington National Ins., Co., Pet

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT MATTHEW RANCOSKY, : No. 124 WAL 2016 ADMINISTRATOR DBN OF THE ESTATE : OF LEANN RANCOSKY AND MATTHEW : RANCOSKY, EXECUTOR OF THE : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from ESTATE OF MARTIN L. RANCOSKY, : the Order of the Superior Court : Respondent : : : v. : : : WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE : COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR BY : MERGER TO CONSECO HEALTH : INSURANCE COMPANY, FORMERLY : KNOWN AS CAPITAL AMERICAN LIFE : INSURANCE COMPANY, : : Petitioner : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue[s] set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue[s], as stated by petitioner, is: Whether this Court should ratify the requirements of Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co., 649 A.2d 680 (Pa. Super. 1994), appeal denied, 659 A.2d 560 (Pa. 1995), for establishing insurer bad faith under 42 Pa.C.S. § 8371, and assuming the answer to be in the affirmative, whether the Superior Court erred in holding that Terletsky factor of a “motive of self-interest or ill-will” is merely a discretionary consideration rather than a mandatory prerequisite to proving bad faith?