IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
ARTHUR COLLIN CHERRY, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D16-689
KATHERINE HIETT VIKER,
Appellee.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed September 6, 2016.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.
Robert Wheeler, Judge.
M. Stephen Stanfield, Gainesville, for Appellant.
Emilian “Ian” Bucataru, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal of a non-final order awarding temporary attorney’s fees and
suit money to Appellee in a child support and custody case, Appellant contends
that the trial court’s order is not supported by competent, substantial evidence. We
agree to the extent that the trial court’s findings regarding the parties’ financial
resources are not supported by the evidence because only argument of counsel –
and no evidence – was presented at the hearing below. Thus, the court could not
have properly determined the need of the party seeking fees or the ability of the
other party to pay. See Giovanini v. Giovanini, 89 So. 3d 280, 282 (Fla. 1st DCA
2012) (“An award of attorney’s fees pursuant to section 61.16 must be based on the
need of the party seeking the fees and the ability of the other party to pay the
fees.”). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new hearing. See Baker v.
Baker, 35 So. 3d 76, 77-78 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (reversing and remanding an
award of temporary fees where party seeking fee award failed to produce evidence
to support the award because “a temporary award does not create vested rights”).
By this disposition, we expressly decline to reach the issue of whether the record
supports the amounts of suit money and attorney’s fees awarded by the trial court.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
LEWIS, WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
2