Capital Dynamics v. Cambridge Associates, LLC

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CAPITAL DYNAMICS, Appellant v. CAMBRIDGE ASSOCIATES, LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2016-1318 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. CBM2014- 00079. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ EDMOND R. BANNON, Fish & Richardson, P.C., New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by JONATHAN A. MARSHALL. DALILA ARGAEZ WENDLANDT, Ropes & Gray LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by JON STEVEN BAUGHMAN, JORDAN ROSSEN, DARRELL STARK, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 9, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court