IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-74,676-04
EX PARTE JASON EARL WOOLEY, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 997161-C IN THE 176TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam. ALCALA , J., filed a concurring opinion.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and
sentenced to forty years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.
Wooley v. State, 223 S.W.3d 732 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2007). We granted Applicant’s
petition for discretionary review and reversed and remanded. Wooley v. State, 273 S.W.3d 260 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2008). On remand, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed Applicant’s conviction.
Wooley v. State, No. 14-06-00088-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 22, 2009) (not
designated for publication).
2
Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel failed to investigate, interview, and
call witnesses who worked at the Black Widow Tattoo Parlor.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these
circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
shall order trial counsel to respond to the above claim. In his response, counsel shall state whether
he investigated and interviewed these witnesses and why he did not call them at trial. The trial court
may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
After reviewing counsel’s response, the trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions
of law as to whether counsel’s conduct was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court
shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and
appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
be obtained from this Court.
3
Filed: September 21, 2016
Do not publish