Matter of Simmons v. Kirkpatrick

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: September 22, 2016 522710 ________________________________ In the Matter of DEREK SIMMONS, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT MICHAEL KIRKPATRICK, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent. ________________________________ Calendar Date: August 8, 2016 Before: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Egan Jr., Lynch and Devine, JJ. __________ Derek Simmons, Dannemora, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent. __________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Ballard v Racette, 140 AD3d -2- 522710 1428, 1428 [2016]).1 McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Egan Jr., Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur. ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs. ENTER: Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court 1 In his reply brief, petitioner contends that this Court's 2015 memorandum and order directing expungement of a 2013 determination finding him guilty of creating a disturbance has not been complied with (Matter of Simmons v LaValley, 130 AD3d 1126, 1127 [2015]). While petitioner appears to be correct, expungement of a prior determination is not a proper remedy in this proceeding (see CPLR 7803 [1]).