NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 26 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: CATHOLIC BISHOP OF No. 15-35197
NORTHERN ALASKA,
D.C. No. 4:14-cv-00010-HRH
Debtor, District of Alaska,
______________________________ Fairbanks
DEWEY GREEN; MARY READER, ORDER AMENDING
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNAATUQ, LLC,
Defendant-Appellee.
In re: CATHOLIC BISHOP OF No. 15-35205
NORTHERN ALASKA,
D.C. No. 4:14-cv-00012-HRH
Debtor,
______________________________
LOUIE GREEN, Jr.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNAATUQ, LLC,
Defendant-Appellee.
Before: FISHER, PAEZ, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
The memorandum disposition filed on August 17, 2016 is amended on page
three line six by adding new footnote one, which states:
Claimants’ argument that the bankruptcy court lacked
jurisdiction over them fails. Claimants filed a Rule 60(b)(4) motion in
the bankruptcy court seeking relief from the prior sale order, arguing
that they had acquired title to a portion of the Property through adverse
possession. See Wellness Int’l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif, 135 S. Ct. 1932,
1939 (2015) (stating there is no jurisdictional defect “when the parties
knowingly and voluntarily consent to adjudication by a bankruptcy
judge”).
With this amendment, the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED.
No further petitions for rehearing shall be filed.
2