Jeremy Crespin
TDCJ No. 1807429
Hughes Unit
JAN 12 2015 Rt. 2, Box 4400
Gatesville, TX 76597
Able Acosta, Cler^1 ACOS!a,Ctertt
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
P.O. Box 12308
Austin, TX 78711
Januray 5, 2015
RE: WR-82,141-03 & WR-82, 141-04
Dear Clerk:
Please find enclosed copies of documents for both of the
above case numbers. The writ record in WR-82,141-4 has not yet
been forwarded >to this Court. However, Rule 73 of the Texas
Rules of Appellate Proceudre now requires the convicting court
to forward to this Court any Orders Designating Issues.
I have included that Order herein for the Court's records and
it should create a new case number for that writ application.
Please find enclosed the following documents to FILE in
* the record of case number WR-82,141-04:
1) State's Proposed Order Designating Issues
2) Respondent's Answer (Trial Counsel's Affidiavit)
3) Applicant's PRO SE Motion to STRIKE Trial Counsel's
Response and for a Live Evidentiary Hearing J^co ?1^).
Please find enclosed the following document to FILE in the
record
d of case number, WR-82 ,14103
1) Applicant's PRO SE REPLY to Court of Criminal Appeals'
Order Dated December 17, 2014 That 1994 Law Applies
and That the Juvenile Court Only Transferred Conduct
When Applicant Was 16 Years Old.
These documents were FILED in the convicting court; however,
I'm worried that court will not forward these documents to this
Court that is why I am providing a copy.
Thank YOU for your time and assistance in this matter.
Respectfully,
Jeremy/Crespin (j J
Applicant PRO SE
JC/swd
cc: District Court (363rd)
Dallas County District Attorney
FILE
CAUSE NO. F08-16204-W
F08-16205-W
20WOEC 19 PM |.-22
rd
STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 363™ JUDICIAL GAR hTZS^owq
L'«lLA5 CO , Try ac;
V. DISTRICT COURT OF _
JEREMY CRESPIN DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
RESPONDENT'S ANSWER
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF DALLAS
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW PAUL BRAUCHLE, respondent in the above numbered cause and makes
this his response to the Defendant's Writ and would show the Court as follows;
Movant would have the Court believe that I forced the Movant to accept a probation in his
cause and forced him to plead to the offenses he was charged with..
Rather than attempt to answer the hundred or so pages of mendacity, I would ask the Court
to revisit the plea of the Defendant and his answers to the questions asked of him in regard
to his case. I was able to secure him a five year probation which he quickly violated. His
complaints could be directed toward his revocation attorney or himself. A transcript of the
Defendant's plea is attached for the Court's perusal.
FURTHUR AFFIANT SAITH NOT.
PAULBRAUCHLE
On this the jlfj) day ofDecember, 2014, appeared Paul Brauchle, who after being duly
Sworn stated that the forgoing fact are true and correct.
wtfiflOT«awwws«p>fti*ww
LETICIA RUBIO Notary Public for Dallas County, Texas
«*«•f\ Notary Public. State of Texas
^inj, My Commission Expires
Vi'- November 08, 2017
KgX