Robert Lee Martin v. State

January 16, 2015 N0.03-14-00499-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN,TEXAS ROBERT LEE MARTIN § APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE 331stJUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT TRAVIS COUNTY,TEXAS CAUSE NO.95-5530 APPELLANTS OBJECTION TO THE STATES SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: The Appellant respectfully moves for this court to STRIKE the instant Motion for an Extension of the deadline for filing the States brief. Appellant exerts the states brief was currently due on December 1st/2014 and the State requested that the deadline be extended by 30(thirty) days or until January 30th,2015. The State relies upon the following facts to explain its need for an extension of the deadline: 1. Durinq the period since the appellants brief was filed M. SCOTT TALIAFERRO, assistant district attorney on the first request for the deadline be extended has completed and filed an original brief in two other pending appellate cases. He further stated that he had two other pending appellant cases and that he as the Director of the Appellate Division of Travis County District Attorney's Office has spent a considerable amount of time working on a variety of other matters and administrative issues. Now, on this Second(2nd) request that the deadline be extended,the Assistant Dis trict Attorney is KATHRYN A SCALES, a different District Attorney.Althouqh she is a different District Attorney she relies upon the same facts to reasonably explain the need for an extension of the deadline. Appellant opposes the instant MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE DEADLINE FOR FILING THE STATES BRIEF. Appellant filed his MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL,pursuant to CHAPTER 64 of the TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE on July 10th,2011.The Trial Court took 3(three) years to consider and rule on Appellants Motion which was denied on "July 18th/2014. The District Attorney has had more then enough time to ensure that the Court has /, a proper States brief to aid in the disposition of this cause # 95-5530.The District Attorneys office has numerous assistant District Attorney's that could file the brief for State especially one who has no heavy case load and are able to file the brief without requesting an extension of the deadline. The State has had more then enough time to file its brief.The Appellant OBJECTS,to the States (2nd)second Motion for Extension of the deadline and request this Court to STRIKE the States instant Motion for extension of the deadline. The request is not made for purpose of delay,but to ensure that the disposition of Appellants brief is handle properly. PRAYER Wherefore,the Appellant respectfully request that this Court STRIKES the States (2nd) second MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF THE DEADLINE. Robert Martin#^/ o^A •4 CERTIFICATE OF .SERVICE "OJIoVjM »dfm^> I 'X a ^ "prdfts- Sfl/0€|fHI|Ml||»l|