2.^1,^2-21
ROY L. SMITHWICIK JR.
TDC\J#622814 McConnell /
3001 S. Emily^Dr.
Beeville, Tx..,78102
Court of Crimijnal Appeals BV:!_PC»
ATTN: ClerK
CAPITOL STATION _
P.O. Box 12303
Austin'Tx. 73711
RE: Application Error CCA#29/892-21 March 24, 2015
Dear Clerk,
You were instructed not to accept-another Application for 11.07
unless the requirments were met for a Successive application under
Sec. 4 ....,
In November -2014 the Court of Criinina.l Appeals found that a
filing for Habeas Corpus Relief Under Art. 11.073 Satisfied Article
11.07 Sec. 4(a) (1) ; As the " L E GAL BASIS" of Art. 11.. 073
was net available for consideration in a previous Application.
(See: Ex Parte Neal Hampton Robbins, CCA#73,484-02) "
Ex Parte Robbins re^submitted the same exact errors cited in a
previous application.under the New "Legal Basis"(Art.11.073) that
was previously unavailable.
-LIKE WISE-
My resent Application for relief was .due. to the previously
UNAVAILABLE LEGAL BASIS OF ART. 11.073.
Ex Parte Robbins has defined Art. 11.073 as a New "Legal Bassis"
metting the requirements for a Successive Application to specifically
address discredited Scientific testimony relied upon by the State.
Will you please RE-Consider my Application for review under the
NEW STATUTE previously unavailable. Also consider and present to
the court the Objection I mail your office concerning the Application.
Thank you for your time and attention. Will you please eddvise
me of your decision for review Under the New Statute previously
Unavailble.
Respectfully
SMITHWICK JR,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
27 2015
Abel Acosta, Clerk