AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed January 12, 2015.
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-14-00155-CR
No. 05-14-00156-CR
No. 05-14-00157-CR
No. 05-14-00158-CR
RANDY ALEXANDER REYES, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-35901-U, F13-34158-U, F13-34208-U, F13-34209-U
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Lang-Miers, and Myers
Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers
Randy Alexander Reyes appeals his convictions for burglary of a habitation, aggravated
robbery with a deadly weapon (two offenses), and possession of alprazolam in an amount less
than twenty-eight grams within a drug-free zone. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §§ 29.03(a)(2),
30.02(a)(1) (West 2011 & Supp. 2014); TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. §§ 481.117(a), (b),
481.134(e) (West 2010 & Supp. 2014). The trial court assessed punishment at twenty years’
imprisonment for burglary; twenty-five years’ imprisonment for each aggravated robbery; and
two years’ confinement in State jail for possession of alprazolam. On appeal, appellant’s
attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit.
The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief
presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable
grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.]
1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to
file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313,
319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders
cases).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree
the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably
support the appeals.
We affirm the trial court’s judgments.
Elizabeth Lang-Miers/
ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS
JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
140155F.U05
-2-
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
RANDY ALEXANDER REYES, Appeal from the 291st Judicial District
Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
F11-35901-U).
No. 05-14-00155-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers,
Justices Bridges and Myers participating.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is
AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered January 12, 2015.
-3-
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
RANDY ALEXANDER REYES, Appeal from the 291st Judicial District
Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
F13-34158-U).
No. 05-14-00156-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers,
Justices Bridges and Myers participating.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered January 12, 2015.
-4-
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
RANDY ALEXANDER REYES, Appeal from the 291st Judicial District
Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
F13-34208-U).
No. 05-14-00157-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers,
Justices Bridges and Myers participating.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered January 12, 2015.
-5-
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
RANDY ALEXANDER REYES, Appeal from the 291st Judicial District
Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
F13-34209-U).
No. 05-14-00158-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers,
Justices Bridges and Myers participating.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered January 12, 2015.
-6-