Kemul Lindsey v. State

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date filed: 2015-10-08
Citations:
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
                            NUMBER 13-15-00421-CR

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

KEMUL LINDSEY,                                                              Appellant,

                                            v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                 Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 117th District Court
                   of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION
       Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes
                     Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      Appellant, Kemul Lindsey, attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction for

retaliation. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

      This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed

notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent
a timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to address the

merits of the appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).

       The trial court imposed sentence in this matter on February 23, 2009. Appellant

filed his notice of appeal on September 8, 2015. On September 16, 2015, the Clerk of

this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely perfected and

that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days from

the date of receipt of the Court’s directive. Appellant has not filed a response to the

Court’s directive.

       Unless a motion for new trial has been timely filed, a notice of appeal must be filed

within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after

the day the trial court enters an appealable order. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Where a

timely motion for new trial has been filed, the notice of appeal must be filed within ninety

days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court. See id. 26.2(a)(2).

The time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the

deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying

with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. 26.3.

       Appellant’s notice of appeal, filed more than six years after sentence was imposed,

was untimely, and accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. See Slaton, 981

S.W.2d at 210.       Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a

post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals;

however, the availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX.

                                             2
CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a) (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988

S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999).

      The appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                                                 PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 8th
day of October, 2015.




                                          3