Herring, Timothy

CAUSE NO. 3 76-tS ^— ORIGINAL IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS TIMOTHY HERRING/ APPELLANT APR 02 2015 VS. Abel Acosta, Clerk THE STATE OF TEXAS, RESPONDENT APPELLANT PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE 271ST. DISTRICT COURT OF WISE COUNTY CAUSE NUMBER (CR16345), AND THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS IN FORT WORTH, TEXAS CAUSE NUMBER 02-12-00546-CR. FILED IN rniiDT^^n,,,,., COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APR 09 2015 Abel Acosta, Clerk TIMOTHY. HERRING (PRO-SE) TDCJ-NO. 01822827 JOHN CONNALLY UNIT 899 FM 632 KENEDY,' TEXAS 78119 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS .v. ... : .ii INDEX OF AUTHORITY . . .iii STATEMENT OF PROCEDURAL HISTORY. .iv STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENTS . :. „ . . 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE .. . ........ ... 2 GROUND FOR REVIEW: .... ... .... . . .... . 2 GROUND FOR REVIEW NUMBER ONE: DID THE COURT OF APPEALS ERR IN CONDUCTING AN INCOMPLETE FACTUAL SUFFICIENCY REVIEW WHEN THE COURT FAILED TO DISCUSS KEY EVIDENCE CONTAINED IN THE RECORD, BUT INSTEAD ONLY CONSIDERED THE LEGAL SUFFICIENCY STANDARD OF REVIEW? REASON FOR REVIEW: THE COURT OF APPEALS. HAS DECIDED AN IMPORTANT QUESTION OF STATE LAW THAT IS IN CONFLICT WITH APPLICABLE DECISIONS OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, IN PARTICULAR SIMS V. STATE, NO. 1328-01 (TEX.CR.APP. MARCH 12,2003) AND CAIN v. STATE 958 S.W, 2d 404 (TEX.CR.APP. 1997) ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES. . .... . ... 3 PRAYER FOR RELIEF. . ., . .4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. . . ... ..... .-v. 5 APPENDIX [OPINION] ATTACHED 11 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES STATE CASES: PAGES SIMS v. STATE, NO. 1328-01 (TEX.CR.APP. MARCH 12, 2003) .2,3,4 CAIN v. STATE, 958 S.W.2d 404,408 (TEX.CR.APP.1997) 2,3-4 FEDERAL LAW JACKSON v. VIRGINIA 443 U.S. 307, 319 (99 S Ct.2781,2789 (1979).3 STATUES SEC. 15.01 (a), TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. (WEST 2011) iv,3 SEC. 19.02 (b)(1), TEX.PENAL CODE ANN (WEST 2011). iv,3 SEC. 19.03 (a)(1), TEX.-PENAL CODE ANN. (WEST SUPP. 2013) iv,3 CONSTITUTION PROVISIONS 14TH AMENDMENT U.S. CONST .. .. .-2,3 6TH AMENDMENT U.S. CONST - 2.3 ART. 1 SEC. 10- TEX. CONST 2,3 ill STATEMENT OF PROCEDURAL HISTORY Appellant was indicted for Attempted Capital Murder. The offense was alleged to have occurred on or about June 2011. A jury convicted Appellant of Attempted Capital Murder, based