UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JEANNETTE J.CLACK WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS PHlL|p J_ DEVL{N CLERK OFCOURT ' 501 west s"' street, suite 1100 CHIEFDEPW Austin, Texas 78701 ' August 19, 2015 _ RECE|VED |N t COURT oF chMlNAL APPEALS Court of Criminal Appeals ` , ‘ P.o. Box 12308 r AUB 21 2015 Austin, Texas 78711 To Whorn lt May Concern, AbezAcoSta, Clerk The enclosed documents were received on August 17, 2015. It appears they were addressed to us in error and are intended for your court. If this office can assist you in any other manner, please let us know. Very truly yours, JEANNETTE J. CLACK, Clerk By:_Deputy Clerk/AD CC: Dietrick Lewis Johnson, Sr. ’ dyeing Lv ~g_:;m§-W 3a . ga.$g;z'@| \‘LZS\~Q?B RECElvED IN 40 CQJQL' Q’ v d gg,q.éd~to,§ gm adm(;L_;,¢ QW¢YOURT oF chMINALAPPEALs , `; / ‘ >Q 9§=,@'~\© é?`, _<¢, %C»AQMQN'." `T&xo/§ 7773© _AUG 212015 37;/,¢~@" Aeeiaeesraelerk` 1\1 \¥\§. C¢;)C‘T" &F QQ~;/\A:'{NAL. AYQEAL"> QF “‘T’é>¢,QS ‘\>c>, \A)Q’ XZ) SSQD.~@\ ':’N §§ >:-.:EjQ-r¢;\< LL=,V¢:§ ;._;'L;H\\§¢M §Aj M '\/\\ AO()\_T<;AT~'L*>¢\\ grid v\/?_~"" ¢\F M.§N>AML>§ ' TCAQ§¢ /\@§ 91::2;2:»~1 ama 3\~=¢ 31;>33 ;)@1;,)’ 21¢:1»33 3\‘1 'Z\SSl-t &\\h \DA=:; :M M§T~:Q\( AQ@:L \§ ,3¢3\§ 8@\“ wmerL ¢HQN& £em~¢>§ \,\/G’¢¢ cJ-;"'.'t-mél_\ 8 "T\;is 02@4/§:;':¢,\\ . / § "" /\/§» , __ \¢JAS _T(r\\j €q\/c¢<\ i§‘-' lM€ >6&~§£. Q - l '._F-. l _' ”" c __' .§ ¢= é’."" "" E§ 51 £T’ZM£N‘."' csc '_'£'/\AM‘T'A¢\T F:<\<"’."S :\:\££`£ .TL>\ &/{em>§\.c'r' £QL& nF ':'~J.'t`\xg§.$‘ .'_;Me§¢_l"d\,x.` \ @"7' \A)£“‘"`“"z:€ l-\AR >…Q (`/\0\\ 1~§ \_c_'°'."TSL`§ c\}€<=~"" T'r./\~ \ \£§L\_t§&_ CQNSG L A\h> s’."‘»';z g \,J£J.'£ )"'E »MEI \/n€&;¢§m»o"'” .:r~(~ T§§,§§ AN> ML,M¢~, >>¢mmsmq‘:;-a /52&3§11:'.¢>.::.4¢ Wl',‘;§(‘ml\a.p:.`r‘.l / /""'1'¢.'>'\\1 SQ)d/\i 13€>\§ F\S`J\P am "TFFa Ql-im\i€ At\i?__' ND\A/ EML U\x";"a> \l-i*;.;`é LT.'/\.\E cf \/C.zNC \rJl-l/-VTC_‘ \m) A£Z 141 , , §»_ ' 101¢\1"‘" m\t&&m\d \n/E;LL_ .1HA'1" 5 Er\\m_deG-i AFT+AT »» "' ') (/mE-.~_ 11:31)_ 1116 L§@b §§ `/`\/_\_€ac:-€L,L Aoa-:L-! iva 1,.,;‘.\;9§‘ 1137 ,TSA\.L' CA§1§5§11‘°°" g \_L‘, 3 CFL. \D'. 511 TSA:AH \'. \'Z .-.\-t@\_A/we£., ::: ¥&A> 1\1}_1l 411 1 §§ L.as';' ‘ d ' ` ‘1’/(`¢~/\15"’1511'\.”1_`| 1§"1.'¢&’\ Q/\\~ -\_Y'i£,- `/ .:v ‘ 1 01 >1""&/\1». QA§£ 1\1;:>. li. LZC:Z>`“@M~ "'"°“'°"“F 1 ” 3 1€'._:"_:’> _ § CE 1€1',~;;1€~.1'55""1'_ ..»;Q.»;. _,/ 4 _ f ~ ~ / .- \ 91 .1`.' .,1_ -",.; item l '~. 311 L~;-递°\i\ _V\c§; `d§g,§ 1 '\31€\,.` ""'1\`_¥1'¢1~\§ \h._> 1'¢\1 A>\[ch_€ §§ 159\);:§1@ ‘_"'& ~/' gm 1 ‘_<> ‘_&j_¢;§oém_:> (‘§1£" (.§. :AN'\ t\\C‘>\ {V\A`D FS`T'\H ADKIL§ _L\’b 1\11>1/\/\1\'3/1§4<§ _”E_Qg§§_§;@!v\€r\~ §:1\1 §§ oim\.dv€ EL§_¢ ”75`1§`1 / ' (-\ d "'I'AM A \~bC@Kéé§ .»q\\> .1 3~;_~ é. ;§""_Y' ~ ` "1\11:11." 'C.~ ` CD ?-"_=?L>,_: ~ c ;:'~Jz~_.. e'*i-LTC W219-81234-2012-HC cp 523 mf.f.r_y § ~¢x°iu§ .. 53 E> In the ;_’ 55 o >. , "'~ co Ex parte Dietrick Lewis 'Johnson § § _ § 219th District Court § § ' of Collin County, Texas ~ Request to Designate Issues il The State of Texas moves this Court to enter an order designati- g issues of controverted, previously unresolved fact to be resolved. j 1. On May 14, 2014; the Clerk served the State with the Application for writ of habeas corpus filed lby Dietrick Lewis Johnson (Applicant) pursuant to Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. ll.07. 2. An application filed under Article ll.07 provides for a prompt review by the trial court to determine Whether the application alleges any facts that iftrue, could entitle the applicant to relief See art 11.07, § 3(_0`). li"th,e court determines ~that controverted fact issues do exist, it shall enter an order designating the issues of fact to be resolved Ia'. § 3(d); see Martin v. Hamlin, 25 S.W.3d 718, 719 (Tex. Crim. A.pp. 2000) (holding the trial court has a duty to designate issues if it determines a habeas application contains controverted issues). Upon entry of an order designating issues, the clerk need not forward the application ».to the Court of Criminal Appeals for 180 days. TeX. R. App. P. 73.4(b)(5). `3.4 Applicant was convicted of aggravated kidnapping after a plea bargain and sentenced to 60 years’ confinement l 4. Applicant alleges prosecutorial misconduct, that his plea bargain is not being followed, ineffective assistance _of trial ' counsel, and actual innocence claims. 5. _ The State generally denies each of Applicant’s allegations The State believes there are controverted issues cof fact material to Applicant’s incarceration The State therefore requests that this Court enter an order designating such issues and the manner of their resolution so that it may, after the issues are resolved, submit a response to assist the Court in making its findings of fact and conclusions of law.