Mo oi-n-ooqao •77*- iS XN THE ORIGINAL COURT OF CfiZMZ/ML APPEALS bF TeLX/IS Lyde.ll t\mxm Jowes courtof ce(«A??aLS U SEP 25 2015 "HE STATE OFTTX/IS , , M ,A Tr^.M ^4aiSJ"jrdiri'!al_Di^rt/l/- "row -Wn-a^ai^JTidiri'lal Di'sfric/- (Courl- (^ourt ofcriminalap TVJWf of Appeals &r +f* _ Abe/ Acosta c/e u PEI IT lOAJ F0f\ DlSCfeTloMARV REVIEW Udell 4wfe.\iJoMes \J0 ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED Mm^n^m^^ ±DOmV OF PARTIES And couns^L- Pe4-i4'iON^r Lydeii Ant^nI 3ott-Se.) 3l£hl.MaiN<3fe|- Cotfroe.,TetfaS T730( ft^SDOKldeyls AooeJlafe, toiMScl Mr, £nK BdTQluwd 300W.OQV(S,Su'ik5lS fl3M539-&&3 RX TARI E. OF f fiNlTEMTS IDENTITY OF PARTIES CflUKlSEL. - ..,.1 TABLE OFT_Q)\)TENT5 ii INDEX OFAUTHORJTTFS. , if .STMTNAFMTRFr-.AR^THr-,^Al Aftftl JMFMT^nKfF^ ? STATEMENT OFTHE CASE z STATEMENT OF PftQCEDURAl HTfiTDR V 2. JjROUNftFOR REVIEW: i. Did The. Appeals £kur|- exr J\J_AmcIiJvi^ -i-hal ffiedvidewc-^ was' \tqai\y 5uPf idewf -haaas^iw a ziomvICxiom d«u]&lis£. evidence, was wsuAVieuf 4tiPiioa4V}£i4- Pdrrhbider likiowiMflly p>osS£.drtfa4iw.i awwhilodclgj-fttoto ^ ceil pf)c*ia^5^ .3 May l/, Sferte., W S.w.ad),iDl s.et al&4S....,,.. 5 PvtWi i/.Skxfe.fts.w.ad wfr^.App^lattU 0W)aas)..,._.... J 3 SfepU V.Sfc^ aWS.Ui.3d f^feApp-lirar^ 3a&pe*cWa ,.. -4 TTeMda \/ Sfata35£ S.W,3dti& Cr^.Crm. App 3tfia) 7 lJ"W^VXacoU^u.S.|CrilM,i^^ *. JTATUTES: TEX.PEMALCOT b.Od. . . .3 tev. Health &safety cooe^i.i^ ... '*•«'..-, ^ ^ . .-^_; -I EVAS RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE IdId,^, .3,4, TEV.KubJfvicI I04fa), -. _ . _ „ n TtV .Rale.Evid BOi . _ .',"-*. -*'- J,\7."" I Vh TEyAult.Evidl 90L..,., _ n 111 NO. Oi-ia-ooqan . IN THE COUKT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEYA5 LVOELL ANTON TONE3 V HE STATE OF TEYAS Recpoxidewf PeirtioKl 'im Cause K!d. i'3-Oq - Deliver orMaMuPachirtL a £Wrol(ed SubstaMce. £fc. c^aO-TWixdifekteyl- fll6D hod IKree dwrnwceM^ir paragraphs alleging 4iha4- Pefffi'owef had +hree_ previous -Peiowvj (LDuVfcJiDKls, P^ower dM-Wed aplea dP Mat guilty* but- 0kl August &l,aDl3. QJUfy •foukd hiu quilty after his trial wfk flai?* Oistnet Courf of MoxL/uery CouKjty. apvV.6 oII. dft. Q*5. After o? pUMfehMeJil +rial 4taju»y fbuiod al!4Wewhc»m^pQf^ Sfirtfavlced PMb^kjr to k5 yfiar5 in mtlblcs DeprjfrUeKrf of driMiwd Tusfice . CA p r?. Pel-rkoNer Aled a wrfflietf Nofce, of"app&t( om Seplm 14,2013 d/l. 0.133. f&0C£PURAL MTgTjyy; The judgMoij-of P^bNidf'5 CDNVieflDKi Wfld arid*! DM Av^ud Ai 400 &Ndl C^)M3l%fDfju4lC65 !<^£S f '5 was receivfaq, because,fhe.bewailed package wasCfiNcealcd tf/jdNflf ra/iewiflfele.AAV3 pcj l'5oThem is KjbsutTfci^rf evidewcdfo prove, peftftbhler was lortQira for fhis sealed Mailed package, prior+o fhe.Qmesti'M^ datefJANLWAy 5, 3lOI#J. FudW Mwne^pefflibKJcr MCVer opeAi fke, sealed Mai Ltd pftckc^^-fhe evidence. is dearly iMSu#i show fld-- Vh'i^jer had fhe'iKjfeMf c^d cowsoouSMe&S -fo+rQAiafer or Oliver fhis 36ttldd NACuitd package., fopiNiow. pcj IlHi )/There's wo iMi/fisfi gafnrs/ evideuct. beifDfehQMdjfp prove pefctowerhad aiviy imWion •ro+raitofer ffi£.pad<&ae, orQMv eoNsqousN€ss of whaf wasyw'tthirt repackage; Robert v.Sta-le,eo • As (MfcEvaws V.^ate Case_,peWibwer wets fc>ci3iC£illy iNfJiesaMe pDsifio^iN arMMejogth pPacoufrolled QabsfaMGLQMd Charaed lo£Caua£_ ^ffv accessibly flrroN^aMew-fe,S&TEX. Health &SAfetv cook %4M -1 ia CA); Pdto^-ouk/ ptcK up a wailed prxk^ge-yfhe euideMce. is /MSLrfPfcieA»f-to show ^Aid prove pcWioNar kwevw ^haf ht was pDssEseiMg, fiycM i-f ibt sUe di*«^ei/idej!ic6 ja^+Qs-fha/did iM fhe. E\/aws v.Stafa. cofle. coMfmbawd was im pfaiMview +d Q(xually reye^se.fhe,cbrr|fis flaa'iMpf EvaMS.fhb caSd. Mii^hf wol-haoe beew ^p^rlsdi vP CbKjTmbQNri Was aetUallv/ thecal or Ma'il-ed 4o 4e addr^s^ he vuos Qf. 3 GlfOLIkld -for frlVT^W NLlMaer OWeL (LQNTXNbikft TKe-cjccLC-sSibtlily of fhfi padcagdyflMd^lao fheL^uaKifHy ito'ftapacfcag-e. does show valid if/ of aw UNlawful possession,bu4Ylrdde3 Mot prove. pehfioMer wari aware, of whaf h^ was po^eastwa^eveM wifh diredr or- QjrcuM&raM"ha I £VideKjct_ because, hht Cj3Ki4rcibaKid was tow celled wiffuM a sealed NArJukd padkage.* Xk) 4he_f^dedex v. Stak, us g.w, 3d 3^5 fhere was flavomkle 1'ighf fo iIIum'i wftk. 4he £on Vicri on, because cowfmba/od was ftuj^d ima house Mr. Poindetkr had atC£S3ibii% fi>; SOMe'^sute preSewkd in pefrfomctc fm, bemuse fhc pack age, had pdtfioMer,N;aMe Ok) if, and peMioaer was in possesstow of fke padk^, buf "in bafK cases fhem's No suAi'de^f ei:lfifctob +o prove eifW owe. Amused Con|toII/ isAoMcigeMdwf, or dare overfhc sabefciN^ awd fhaf ffw kNtw+he Wrtka||+htev,C!eNte/d,rtdaMd cilCUMsU-dl^ftfafe clearly old urfMed- *cho». IW pt^wr had ^ imW,dm ok, ***.«, aHM.^baf ^ nS£Lfy Jhows (tehhafer in aaseaioN ofihis^Mc^'paiKagc-for-Oiiiy ashad refedWj ofatfrfjt. oncost sKoaU be dosdy e^W fc q,4 3*T f^roaidd frirrewipy m^hprfmn ftid fbe. Appeals CDarT err i"m AVid im 4Wdk seafpfo awd Stiaite- af Pefvfiohier Mail a violafiad of Kiis4™ 'f^iidiA&sh.r^oj^s *£ pM?± /ouers s&aled wailed package w66 ^earthed tfMd 5>ei2£a tAjiffoixf' se^b'Ki^a vJarraNf ? ^ . ThtL-firsf £ourf ofAppeals did k\d+ (mlzr Ine opiJvlfoM ortoM^ to fkMofioh0.for.P\AealriKjQ om 3aKie_ol3,3i0l5; IflavfNg peirhoMer \Md-houfaN'y iwdrucHoJOtb preaexrF 4heT7 &.APP, 8ateU>(3 PeJrjibder preftcwlad AMOTION POft REHfcAfitMa May ID,aa$a\dif WAS dewied 073.^33 ,40(5,fJerrhptttf is toof atalefD attack, ffte Vali'dify atfhe. •ArsrCAuol- ofAppeals dewiai. ftdTjiaier aafcs fhe driMi^l (Wf o^AppeoJLIs fc evmkt 4he, &raurtd giveA) in f-his ADA fV&M f-he Md+idX) foMxheanKig. jupporfive Ctees :Cll,^ VfeWfctift U.IO CM.M) lib F3d^)^ U.S v.LolumsI, 3ci7,u.s.a$tt/asi, ci0 S.Cf.'NHttl I0aq»35 L,£Q.aD a29^lWD}u,S.V.aW>£Wii ' 4bb U<, IW.((4.l(^S.ci-l^a,to L^d ft (i^j ftottw V-CaliWi453 U.S./ 5 GfQUtjd for rev t'evV NUMber4hcee, Dtdfhe. eourf of Appends err im fYwd iwg 4haf kiqfjy prejudicial aud iwfleiMataryhearsa^QKld LJMuufheiofiCared iN^ahiOM ddWN loaded fVoM, a eellphoKjejerroMeoualy adMrtted by4riQl dDurf iwaS hflrMlese ? Whefher a eaurf o-P Appeals 'defiSibNi £Duffiefs vJ4h dNofhereounh aP Appeals dWsi'oM ON) ftoUe. siMilao issues is who! pefrriDMeir f's re~ auesfi'M^ 4he coar4 of CMaiM^i appeals TDOMMiw^Dorsey v/jfafe, ASs.w.ad afWg&; alSo6ee.j Murray v. state., &xi s.w.3d aM/3S3,flbd May v.sfrte.-Wi s.w.srf W,alSo Se^Tiewda v. Stele., 358 s»w-3d k>33. flute Ua.YA^ "HearsayAs aeWeMetfh ofher fhflrt DNe. Made byfhe deelarcuvrr- while hes^ff/Og £Tr: TrifllorheariNj,otferd iijQ/cdfiKlcjt-tuprovefheMaikrasseffed T^v,fi.Evid.gO(rd). rh.s iNdudflrf bofh oral aMd wrrttert aore95iDN5.Te*AB/d.tolfa)a)'MM ouf- of-c^urfafafeMewf which is Niof offed fop rave fhefrtirh Df4he Matter asserted +hdnEL/M, buf is offered -for somc ofho- reasaki,! s rtof hearsay." 5bteMe^; fW tekUt odMiWiort byap^rfy oppoMdw/-arc a/flowo!- hearsay. T^ff S^/^^'^Ad^flr^J- '.* apa**, w£> Makes a jfafemewfr^R. *Z Pib) ,A %teMewf i^DaMOral orwrtftm Verbal expreaaioM or(oi)HQH- vemalco^daaf ofapersajj, if 4 is iNtewd&l fy Kim as sabsfrfufiow -Par-Verbal ^prE35.oN.CopiM,DM p^ao) MEAP^vo^OTOR^ tW.s aaa^iizf wilf £*+u*f courfoMppeals apiwiwo A*d Murray V.frfftk,«04 s.w. ad aim. ifeWioMtr objeekd flemal amsrfng date . MurrayACH s^ JC^a ap|fl-ws ^af toMOuk^d dafci is ^ ^T ^s(fPP«^ labelsfbuMd oMf^Oiii phoMfi.^br^ha^X^bS^id 6 Gimuwd for review Nuuberfhree. c okiTTMiip.r\ pehfiowerjDb teeafio^ wass'idtfs of Adaigr'ifijQ, fhereftre should wo4have beejo UQed acpiNsf Kim to provefne.Matter asseH-ed. Etepuiy Marfiro feafiffed iu p£h+io^Tria),abLiiibftuKdepa£^ hewae a drtyj ,iea(erVv4hoL4fiwd:wg aMy NADMey, soMefh'iMqfhal-'LiDuld fwic pdrhoMer fo adrag pariage aewf froM eali-ft>NOtofoTitosT UOfSey t/,fttafe,<34 a.w.ad 3&Ji HoW tktHhe case was eiofrrdy tircuMftWial, as+tare. were mo eye - Wnweases jwhoksfi-A'fcd af fnahThe coMViefiDia ;'n> ttaey Was rei/ersraJ because- Courf-ft)u»id +he.iUad*fellok heapday kdiukvjy fo bee/freudy prtyudiiual, QiveM 4he.«34Kfe/5 4-heory cf4i\eCQSt, aud +1^4fmf iffeuded fo folate ^ede-few-. SMe fheory c^ere^l bvw£.defk]da,04%Pe4TfoMers case is £wfirefy ejrajMGtaufiJ, jii^fas pDf-SQjs easewas, aMdftareviewwg tourfhefeCt^^^awfitfy^^iet by IWrfy Madijj tesHtooMy asdicerf evictee, ThefesfyUwoy htffcw/asjaa+as pryhdiaal asfhaf in Dor&ey's cas£.,fh'ia is neaarl&biy fii/uular, Xm PefrfiDK)e.r twff^frial tourf fdied OMUrawaWid fV»d^ce,evideNce,fW Xu ;"T iNy ^wty/k-VCost.PefrfiDKier received apdeWi*)4heMaib ^, jWI' li ft f•! ^ ; ^f motion . t=.vicieMCe has Kid raei/aNcti-P if is Mb aL «,/ /, '. j ".f'"«-"iuy uuiMatriDue. iexiaa atbdh. hate QnlfA\ t,ll^lt-Lei"^ is wW ife OroDoNtnf dflius. Abdrotk cSudi-Hon ofari - 4^X* ^"t^T^Y M COMtesf'19 lk rdwtofefl. issudw Mm'4- protend^W^,"^,^TttHPa^-'i"- f¥ 6h0M 9w?™V°shPw,^*™+lfft'f;ioW.XM4lif.-neMda case, ulWt.lv lP'r™fi tHtWh,ib,t3, wha^ pufporW -fo bt- MyWroaaes 7 PRAYER FOR ficbTEP, V r rhe reoooM slated,fhe. fefrfioKier was dkiied a &>4nal ,-w flous£ Mo, .^-OqSla^'WH^ABFQRE^RENAIStS CONSIDERED, Pd-rfio^r huiubly prays |0L fh«f fbe. Houorabte tetfis Ca^rf of CriMiwa) Appeals would qrad a QMoti £*r fully/, su slxfcidI4ilrfoji Jade^ ft* l4oa52,£) foflfWllwiffe.-3.iq) m £? rf-i