Wade, Michael Christopher

rt-1-; ~ -o5
Certified Number ~~XIX~~~~X~~~XXXX~XX~XX~
USPS Tracking ·~R.wn:n¥DDBO~KRK

In The Court of Criminal Appeals
of Texas at Austin,Texas

Michael Christpher Wade § In The 336th Judicial
Vs § District Court of
State of Texas § Grayson County,Texas
§ RECEIVED IN
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Motion for Leave to File NOV 16 2015
Application for Mandamus

To The Honorable Court of Criminal Appeals Texas.

Now Comes Michael Christopher Wade, Relator Complaining
of Grayson County Texas, Pursuant to Rule 211. of the Rules of App-
-ellate Procedure in Criminal Case's. Moves This. Court to Grant This
Applicant Leave to File This Application for Writ of Mandamus Tend-
-ered Contemporaneously with this Motion.
Applicant Prays that The Motion be Granted.The Said Application
I

for Mandamus be filed and Set down for a Hearing that relief Request-
-ed be GranJed and for Other Relief, General and Special Including
a Stay of tJe Proceedings Below, Until the Matters Complained of iri~
Said Application are Cured.

Respec~f/ Sub~~­

~/~,q££ (
Michael C.Wade
··-
Relator Pro-Se

Certificate of Service
I Hereby Certify that a Copy of The Above Motion for Leave to
File Application for Mandamus, was Mailed to the Court of Criminal
Appeals of Texas. P.O.Box 12308 Capitol St~tion, Austin,TEX 78711

-"'.r-/--r~--~~
on This 10 th ,Day of November 2015.

Page 1
 Number
-------------------------------

In The Court of Criminal Appeals of TEXAS
at Austin,Texas.

Michael Christopher Wade §
In The ~36th Judicial
Vs. §
District Court of
State of Texas, §
Grayson County,Texas
Grayson County Judge Presiding, §
397th District Court.
County District Clerk. §
(In The Offical Capacity) §

Application for Writ of Mandamus

To the Honorable Court of Criminal Appeals of TEXAS.

Now Comes, Michael Christopher Wade Applicant and Ask this
Court to Issue a Writ of Mandamus to; District Court of Grayson,Texas
to Require the Respondent Describe Relief Requested and in Support
of This Application would Show the Court the Following;

I.
Applicant was Tried for the Offence of Violation Section 31.03
I
(e)(4)(a). Texas Penal Code THEFT $1.500 < $20 K. In a Case Styled,
The State of Texas Vs. Michael Christopher Wade No# 046500. In The
336th Judical Disrict Court of Grayson County. The Indictment was
Filed in the 336th Judical District Court, which at the Time Relator
I .
was Indicted had Jurisdiction Over Proceedings Arising from Both
Fannin and Grayson Counties. SeeAct of May/17/1985,69th Leg.R.S.Ch
408 § 1 Sec 24.482 in 2007. The Legislature Limited the Jusisdiction
of the 336th Judicial District to Fannin County. See Act of May/28/
2007. 80th Leg R.S.Ch 1342 § 1 (a) Sec 24.542. 2007 Current Version
at Tex Gov't Code Ann § 24.542.
The Legislation Creating The 397th Judical District and Changing the
Territorial Limits of the 336th Judicial District Directed that Case's
from Grayson County that were Pending in the 336th on January/1/2010
be Transfered to the 397th District Court and Allowed the Transfer

page 2
 of any Case's from Grayson County Pending on or After September/15/
2008 to the 397th. Act of May/28/2007. 80th Leg R.S. Ch1342 § 1(h)
sec 24.482,2007 Tex.Gen.Laws.4563. on the 28th Day of February 2000
Cause No# 046500. was Called for Trial. Christopher Wade Pleaded,
Not Guilty. The Jury Found the Defendant, Not Guilty of Violation
Sec 31.03 (e)(4)(a) Texas Penal Code Theft $1.500 < $20 K as Charged
in the Indictment.
See Attached Documents;

(1. EXHIBIT (A) Judgement in Cause Number# 046500 [Not Guilty].
(2. EXHIBIT (B) Petition Filed; petition for Expunction of Records for
Cause Number 046500,August/20/2015.
(3. EXHIBIT .(C) Petitioner Responded to Shelana Brinkley, To the Disrict
Court 397th. 9/28/2015.
(4. EXHIBIT (D) A Follow Up Letter was Mailed to the.Clerk Requesting
that the Orignal Petition for Expungment is filed so a
Honorable Judge can Rule on the Petition, 10/15/2015.
(5. EXHIBIT (E) Attached is Affidavit of Indigency,With Proof Trust fund
Account Bal $0.09 Cents.

II.

Request for Relief

RelatorjRequest in this Application that this Court Direct Re-
-spondent to file and Rule on Orignal Petition for Expunction, That
was Filed August/20/2015.
Expunctions are a Right, Rather a Honorable Judge Grants or Denies
the PetitioJ, A Court Clerk has a Duty to File Pleadings so a Pre-
-siding Judge May Preform his Duty.
There Should be a Hearing and a Ruling,Rather a Relator is Indigent
or Not. This County is Abusing it's Authority Denying Access to the
Courts Presiding Judge.
If the Orignal Petition to Expunge Record. was Denied, The Next step
would be The Right To Appeal.

III.
This Court has Jusisdiction to Consider this Application Pursuant to

page 3
Art.55 of the Texas Constitution and Artical 4.04 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure See Padilla V.McDaniel 122.S.W.3d 805,807(Tex.
Crim.App.2003); Holmes V.Denson 671. S.W.2d 896(Tex.Crim.App.June.
27.1984).

IV.

Authorities and Argument

In Writ of Mandamus have Held that a Trial Court has a Minis-
-terial Duty to [TIMLY] Rule on; Expunction of records. See Heine V.
Texas DPS 92 S.W.3d 642,649(Rex.App.Austin.2002)Pet Denied.The Trial
Court is Required to set a Hearing on a Petition for Expungment.
Individuals who are Incarcerated,Do Not Automatically Loose Their
Access to the Courts, As a Result of their Incarcerated Status.
,-

The Right to Expunction is a Statutory Privilege. TEXAS Code of Crim-
-inal Procedure Art 55.01 Right to Expunction (a) A Person who has
been Placed under a Custodial or NonCustodial Arrest for Commission
of Either A Felony or Misdemeanor is Entitled to have ALL RECORDS
and FILES Relating to the Arrest Expunged If;
(1). The Person is Tried for the offence for which the Person was
Arrested and is:
(A). Acquitted by the Trial Court.
See, EXHIBIT (A) Judgement Number# 046500.
We The Jurylfind the Defendant, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER WADE Not Guilty
of Violation Section 31.03 (e)(4)(a) TEXAS Penal Case Theft $1.500 <
$ :'20K as Charged.
There is NoiReason why Relator Cannot Receive A Court Order to Expunge
the Records. That is a Statutory Privilege. Tx.Code.Crim.Proc.55.01
and 55.02.
Once a petition Arives to a Court, The Clerks Duty is to Place on
Dockett Call as of there own Ommission, The Petition was filed,
August/20/2015. Violating the 30 Day Rule for Expunction of Records·
It is the Courts Duty. TEXAS DEPARTMENT of PUBLIC SAFETY V. Deck. 954
S.W 2d.108(Court of appeals of Texas.1997)
I

Clerks Duty 2.01 is to File Motions/Petitions. In RE Taylor 39 S.W.
3d 406,414(Tex.App.Waco.2001). and Re Salazar 134.S.W. 3d 357,358
(Tx. iWaco- 200;3)_.

page 4
The Respondent in there Capacity as District Clerk of Grayson County
Texas. Has and Presiding Judges has a Ministeral Duty to Receive and
file Papers in Criminal Proceedings or Civil and Perform All Other
Duties Imposed on the Clerk by Law, Pursuant to TCCP.Art.2.21 Appear-
-ing the Orignal Petition for Expungment of Records,Was Not Set for
Doccett Call. To Date the Orignal Petition has Not Been Viewed or
Ruled om the "MERITS" That Relator is Entitled-to.-
Mandamus is Avalable to compel Action on the Part of those Charged
with a Positive Duties by Virtue of Their Offical Position. Hogan V.
Turland 428.S.W.3d 316(1968).
There are Generally Three Reqursities for a Writ of mandamus.A Legal
Duty to Preform, A Non-Discretionary Act, A Demand for Performance
and a Refusal to Preform. See Bantuelle V Renfroe 620 S.W.2d 635
(Tex.App.Dallas.1981).Writ,Red.D.N.RE; The Court of Criminal Appeals
Stated IN; Texas Board of pardons and Paroles V.Miller 590.S.W.2d
142(Tex.Crim.App.1979).Entitlement to a Writ of Mandamus,Must be shown
to be Clear and Indisputable, Unequivocal,Abundantly Clear. Knowles
V. Scofield 598.S.W.2d 854,860(Tex.Crim.App.1980)._ Relator Shows that
the Act Sought _to be Compelled is Strictly Ministerisal in Nature and
There is No Adequate Remedy at Law to Redress the Alleged Harm.
See Aranda V.Dist. Clerk 207 S.W.3d 785,786(Tex.Crim.App.2006)(Per
Curiam)(Orig Proceedings).
In Proper Case's Mandamus May issue to Compel a Trial Court to ''ACT~
In RE Blakeney 254 S.W.3d 569,66l(Tex.App.Texarkana.2008)(0rig Pro-
-ceedings) ;' also See Elilily & Co.Marshall 829 S.W.2d 157,158(Tx.
1992). Trial Court Abuses Discretion by Refusing to Conduct Hearing
and Render Decission on Petition for Expunction of records. Chiles V.
Schuble 788fS.W. 2d 205,207(Tex.App.Houston.14th.Dist.1990).
Mandamus Appropriate Remedy to Require Trial Court to Hold Hearing
and Exercise Discretion. Trial Courts are Not Required to Consider
or Rule on Petitions unless the Petition is Called to the Courts
Attention. Blakeney 25 S.W.3d. at 662 Relation Called Future Delay
to Respond to the Petition as Shown in EXHIBITS ATTACHED.
Pursuant to Statutory Law, A Right has Been Shown in Exhibit(A) Not
Guilty,and Attached Indigency Statues, The Court Should Still file
the Petition.
Mandamus Relief Should be Granted, Relator has Demonstrated that (1)
The Act Sought to be Compelled is Purely Ministerial and (2) The rela~

page 5
-tor has No other Adequate Legal Remedy. Court of Criminal Appeals
Defined the Ministerial Act Requirement to be One in which The re-
-lators, has a Clear and Disputable Right to the Relief Sought and
the merits of it's Legal Position are Beyond Dispute. See Neveu V.
Culver 105 S.W.3d. 641,642(Tex.Crim.App.2003)(Citing State Ex Rel
Rosenthal V.Poe 98 S.W.3d 194,198(Tex.App.2003) Also State Ex.Cel
trkos V.Fine 330. S.W.3d 904,907{Tex.Crim.App.2011).
All Requirements have been Met Under Tex.R.App.P.52. 3(K)(1)(a) In
Exhibits (A)(B)(C)(D)(E). The Trial Court has to Rule on Original
Petition for Expungment.

v.

(1. Relator has No Other Legal Remedy Available to him Other than
this Application for Mandamus.
(2. This Action Sought is under the Facts of this Case, In Essence
A Mere Ministrial Act. Which Respondent has a Legal Duty to
Preform.
(3. Relator has Properly Requested Respondent to Preform which
Respondend has Refused to Answer Petition for Expungment and
Formal Requests.

[EXHIBITS ATTACHED] Are Exactly What was Filed in the Court.

Wherefore, Premises Considered, Relator Prays that this Application
be Granted and that Respondent be Ordered to Rule on the Petition to
Expunge Records.

Res~

Applicant Pro-Se

page 6
STATE OF TEXAS

Affidavit Verfication

Before Me The Undersigned Authoroty on this Date Personally Appeared
Applicant who Upon Being Dully Sworn, Did Dispose and State;

My Name is Michael Christopher Wade (Relator) Who States for
the Record," That The Documents are Verified Fact and Petition
Presented are True and Correct. Proof of Service to All Parties,
Affidavit of Indigency are Attached and Judgement.

Respectfully Submitted

-~at?
Relator Pro-Se

Under Penitlies of Perjury 28 USC 1746. Tx.Civ.Prac & Reme.
Code.Ann § 132.001(a) (West.Supp.2014).
Subscribded and Sworn to Before Me the Undersigned Authority by
said Applicant, on this /Oth day of November, 2015.
i

page 7
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT:

PROOF OF SERVICE TO ALL PARTIES

The right to Expunction is a Statutory Privilege, All Provisions
Have Been Met.
The Right to Expunction ART 55.01
The Trail Court is Required to Set a Hearing on petition for Expunction
SEE Heine V.Texas D.P.S. 92 S.W.3d 642,649(Tex.App.-Austin 2002).

T~e Expunction Statue Artical 55.01 ET.Seq of the TEXAS Code of
Criminal Procedure does Not Require that the Law Enforcement Agencies
be Served with the Expunction Petition Concevably Because an Expunction
hearing is an Exparte Proceedings.
See Barry P.Helft and John M.Schmolesky, Teaxs Criminal Practice Guide
§ 11.03[1] (1996).
However, The Statute does compel the Court to Notify the LAW ENFORCEMENT
AGENTIES LISTED IN THE EXPUNCTION PETITION OF THE EXPUNCTION HEARING.
The Court Shall Set a Hearing on the Matter No Sooner that 30 Day's
from the Filing of the Petion [AND SHALL GIVE REASONABLE NOTICE OF
THE HEARING TO; Each Official or Agency or other Entity Named in
the Petition by Certifyed Mail,Return recipt Requested .... ].
TEXAS.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN.ART 5.~.(>2 § 2(:Vernon.supp.1997).
The Procedure Listed in artical 55.02 are Mandatory. This Court Has
Jurisdiction because this Agency is the Arresting Agency, ByGrayson
Courity Sher~ffs Department,Sherman TEXAS . Which involks Jurisdiction
by Complying with ART 55.02~
It is up to the Clerk to Notify all Parties at this time,Michael
=-h~r=-i~s-=-t~o-t=:p..uh..liie~r____,ll;W~..,~;~au..d~..,~;e;___ _ ,~espectfully request; All parties to be served.
C

Pursuant to Texas Rules of Civil Pr6cedure & title 6 Chapter 132 of
the Civil Pratice and Remedies code under Penalty of Perjury,
Excuted on this 10th day. of. Novembei:' 2015.

RESPECTFULLY

page 8
:.1
 ORDER

On This Day Came on to be Heard the Forgoing

Applicant for Writ of Mandamus and it Appears

to the Court that the Same should Be:

GRANTED
--------

It is therefore Ordered That the Custodian of

Records Should Photo Copy and Mail to Applicant

In the Interest of Justice.

Signed on this The _________ Day of ______________

2015.

Honorable Judge Presiding
'EXHIBIT (A)
EXHIBIT(A)
Mar 17 '00 11:45 _ P.Oi

. :·,, -~ ~r

.NO.~
THE'STATE OP'IJ!XAS • IN THE 336TH JUDICIAL
vs.. • DJSl1UCt COUJtT Of
MICBAiiL CIDJSTOPJII!R. WADE • GMYSONCO'UNTY, 'tEXAS
JUDGMENT
oa tlda tbs 2801 day o~. 2000, tbis cause \VB8 cilled fOrtltBI. 8lld die State

~ by bar .Coml2y ~. sad lbo Delimdam. M1QIAEL OIRJSTOPHBR
WAJY/J., eppeBNil lD persoa. his OIIUDIIf. .ClU!TA LYNN CAR1liR IL. also. beiDa

P-cmt. ad bolb paztiaa aJIJIOimCCid. nady 1br !liaJ. aDd Ch8 De!atdaD.f, MiaiAEL

CHJUSTOPHER-WADB. ill opea ccmrt pltallcd act pltty to tbe clwao Cftldl!lud Ia lhe
I~ heteill; lhertlupou, a J\JlY, to-wit I (b)(7)(Cl . .. ~ elovaz (11) vthcn.
were duly Alcacil, impaJiftled, ad r;wvaa. 'IYhO, hariq hard tho·imli~ read. mdlhe

~· ploa of !lot BJ~lb1.1hcmo. ·a bPiDg 1tean1 fba m~ Sldlmf1ted. IIIII
bavlug beat 4v.1y dl8lpd 11)' che Court. n:tlnid iD dlarp of thl Pl'OJIIII' o!lcar to OODiicler
EXHIBIT(A)
of tbeit Wld1ct,. ad aPurward were llruvPl iiiiO opea court by U. pcoper oJScer.. the

Deteadaul ad hJ5 COIIIIIS1 bq pruat, eadla cu tbiUI oflltw raunsed into cpcl comt
tho tbltowlq 'lad1cl, wbicb wa niCOMICl by e. enst. IIDd is heN ltOW Clltlltocl apcm tho

MiDutlls oftheOMut. to-wit:

"We. Ole jury, flad lhe dc:h4tml, NJQfA8L CDUSTOPHD. WAD!, DOt guiby

ofVIolale $ccdoa 31.03(e)(4)(A) Twas Pelfal Code THBPT >4l,SOO =$1,500 <$20R
Disposition Information
02/28/00 Sentence Commensed
02/28/00 Sentence Imposed
02/28/00 Disposed: Jury ~rial Not Guilty 57J 19
Jury Trial: Yes

Fl-Exit F8-Next

\.
 EXHIBIT(B) 7{;-~tr?
(B)
CAUSE NUMBER, _______________
(\ 1)\)~
~ ' ~ \':J .
0,1 'j
~~.v tt, ~
Exparte §
§
In the 336 th Judicial ( 4; \. c:fo. :../~
§ District Court of "---
Michael Christopher Wade § Grayson County,Texas
§

PETITION FOR EXPUNCTION OF RECORDS
. •.

To The Honorable Judge of said Court;

Comes Now, Michael C.Wade, Appering Pro-Se and Petitons
This Court to Order the Expunction of ALL RECORDS and FILES Arising
out of Petitioners Charge, IN THE 336th Judical District Court of
Grayson County,Texas. Cause Number # 046500 and in Support of this
Petiton would show the Court the following;

I

Petitioner is a white Male whose Full Name is, Micha~l C.Wade.
Petitioner was born on December/30/1966 and his Social Security 0
Number is XXX-XX-XXXX.

II

JURISDICTION
... P.e.t.it.ione.r Involks. Jur.isdic t.ion of .the Court by Complying· with
' ' ' 'I '4 ".1 ~, If

Artical 55.01'ffind
I •
artical 55.02 Tex.Code of Criminal Procedure.
Requesting an Order of Expunction for Records and files for Cause#
046500 Formal Arrest was Made By f:i'.,.:€::.·6.;:6 · Grayson County, Texas.
Grayson co Shriffs Office.
III

Affidavit of Indigency Declaration of Inability to pay cost is
Attached on the page i of this Petition. Petitioner Moves this Court
to Proceed, UNDER Indigency Status.

page 1
 IV

On Feb/26/1999 Petitioner was served with a copy of the
Indictment/Information in Cause # 046500. In Lieu of Formal
Arrest or By Arrest,G~C.Shriffs Petitioner was Charged with
Committing the Offence of theft $1.500 < $20.000 Felony.
On Feb/26/1999 and Cause Number # 046500 was filed Against _
Petitioner in the County Court of Grayson County,Texas.

* Arrical 55.01(a)(2) to be entitled to Expunction wh~n Criminal
Charges are Dis-Missed.
* Artical 55.01(a)(ii) Indictment Dis-Missed. Part(b) the Charge
Did Not Result in a Final Conviction.
* Tex.Code.Crim.Proc.Ann.Art 55.01(a)(2)(Vernon Supp 2003).
~The Right to Expunction is a Statutory Privilage.
In RE A.R. 225. S.W.3d 643,646(Tex.App-El Paso 2006 no pet).
Artical 55.01 (a)(1)(a) ACQUITTED BY THE TRAIL COURT.

Attached is Strict Proof, Judgement Cause # 046500, "WE THE JURY,
FIND THE DEFENDANT MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER WADE [NOT GUILTY] of Violation
Section 31.03(e)(4)(a) Texas Penal Code THEFT $1.500 < $.20.000 as
Charged in the Indictment.

Jury Trail LNot GuiltyJ Feb/28/2000.

Petitioner Respectfully Enters Exhibit (a)and(b) This Musters
Art.55.01 and Art55.02 RIGHT TO EXPUNCTION.
Burden of Proving that All of the Statutory Requirements are
. I
Satisfied. SEE Exparte Wilson 224 S.W.3d 860.(App 6 Dist.2007)
also T.D.P.S V.J.H.J,. 274 S.W.3d 803(App.14.Dist.2008).

The Expunction Statue 55.01.E.T.Seq of the Texas code 'Of Criminal
Procedure, Does Not Require that .the law Enforcement Agencies be
Served with the Expunction Petition.
[Conceivably because, An Expunction hearing is An; Exparte Pro-
~ceeding.

See Barry P.Helft & John M.Scholesky,(1) Texas Criminal Practice
Guide § 11.03 [1](1996).

page 2
 \
\

However the statue does Compel the Court to; Notify the Law
Enforcement Agencies listed in the Expunction Petition of the
Expunction hearing.

The Court Shall Set a Hearing on the Matter No Sooner than
Thirty Days From the Filing of the Petition and Shall give a
Reasonable Notice of the hearing to each Official or Agency or
Other Entity Named in the Petition By Certified Mail,Return
Receipt requested.
Tex.Cod~.Crim.Pr6c.Ann~Art 55.02 § 2(Vernon Supp 1997).
Artical 55.02 are Mandatory.

Petitioner Request that The Trail Court make written· Findings of
Fact and Conclusions of Law, Pursuant to Tex.R.CPV.P.296.

Petitioner has reason to believe that the Following Agencies
Officials or Other Public Enities of this Staie have Records 5
Concerning the Charge in Cause Number # 046500.

(1 Texas board of Pardons and Paroles, P.O.Box 13401 Capital Sta
Austiri,Texas 78711-3401
(2 Texas Department of Public Safty P.O.Box 4087
Austin,Texas 78773-0001
(3 Teaxs Department of Criminal Justice [Internal Affairs Div]
P.O.Box 4003 Huntsville,Texas 77342-4003
(4 Texas Department of Criminal Justice [Parole Division]
P~O.B~x 13401 Capitol Station Austin,Texas 78711-3401
(5 Texas department of Criminal Justice[ Classfication and
Records office] P.O.Box 99 Huntsville,Texas 77342-0022
(6 Grayson county District Clerk, Kelly ashmore 200 S. Crockett
Sherman,Texas 75090
(7 Sherman P.D 317 S.Travis Street Sherman,Texas 75090
(8 Federal Bureau of Investigations 1000 Custer Hollow RD
Clarksburg W.V. 26306-0001
(9 ALL Agencies that have Custody of Paper Work Attached to this
Cause Number # 046500.

page 3
 AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY

s
Texas rules of Civil procedure,
title 6,chapter 132,texas civil
Practice and remedies code.

NOW RESPECTFULLY comes Michael C.Wade .T.D.C.J.#1571415
presently .at the Stevenson unit in cuero(dewitt county)Texas,
77954-6300. I declare that I am unable to pay the court cost in
this request to the court, and requests leave of the. court to pro-
-ceed- In Forma Pauperis- in this accompanying request and action
while showing the court the following;

(1) I am presently incarcerated in the Texas Department.6f
Criminal Justice-Correctional Institution Division
where I am not permitted to handle Money; and

(2) I have no Source of income and do not recieve pay;and
C-e.f'.\('
(3) I currently have $ 0 . 9 ~s Creited to me in the
T.D.C.J. Inmate Trust fund;and

(4) During my incarceration in the texas department of
Criminal Justice - Correctional Institution Division,
I have Approximately $ 0 Dorrars per month as
as Gifts from Relatives and friends,and

(5) I neither own nor have an interest in any realty,stocks
bonds or bank accounts, and, I receive no interest or
dividend income from any source;and
(6) I have 0
-"""---
dependants; and
(7) I have total debts of approximately $ 0 __dollars;
and -"""'--

(8) I owe $ 0
_.>::,....._
~n restitution;and

(9) My monthly expenses in Hygiene and Medical expenses are
approximately $ 0 dollars.
I
I, Michael C.wade .T.D.C.J.# 1571415 ,being presently
incarcerated at the Stevenson.unit, Located at 1525 FM 766,Cuero,Tx
77954-6300 (361) 257-207S,Declare and Verify under penalty of perjury
that the foregoing statements in this Affidavit of Indigence are True
and Correct ..
EXECUTED on this .1l7 day of

NOTE:
Amendments to the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies code §132.001,
Now Allows An~ Party to us~ an Unsworn Declaration instead of an
affidavit or Verification ~2012).

Affidavit of Indigence
Pro Se,Self-Representing Litigant Page 4
 -- --- ---- ······--''-·-·-,----·::---·.--,.,~.:-'-::'-:;:;~,

.ocati on .. , : 0711 - 01 Coonissary &TrU5t Fund Date: 7/c":l/15
lalPsperson: RC00024 STEVENSON UNIT Ti11e: 11:35:12 •.
Coaaissary Purchasp.Receipt Pag!?: 1
;urchasPr: WAD£, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER Housing: K-2 CELU7
D Nu~ber: 01571415 Beginning Account Balancf: $.0'3 Begin Spend Limit: $.09
tell Nu111be1' Item Description Unit Price Quantity Ext.Amt Class Spend Li11it

f No Records to Print *
Transaction Total: $.00
Sales Tax included in above amount: $.00
Ending Account Balance: $.09 End Spend Limit:
SIGNATURE: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _THUMBPRINT _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
ALL SALES FINAL~!~!~!!'- NO REFUNDS OR EXCHANGES'~!'!!'~~'

page 5
 Pursuant to Chapter 55 of the code of Criminal Procedure~

Petitioner is entitled to have All Records and files Concerning the
Charge in this Case EXPUNGED for the following Reason;

The aforementioned Offence on Feb/28/2000 Cause Number # 046500
was [DIS-MISSED], Disposed by Jury Trail [NOT GUILTY].
Wherefore, The Petitioner Prays the Court;

(1 To S~t this Matter for a Hearing.
(2 To Give Reasonable notice of the Hearing to Each Offical
Agency or Other Public Entity Named in paragraph, Page~3 of
this petition, Pursuant to Artical 55.02 Section 2 of the
Texas Code of Criminal procedure~

(3 After the Hearing of this Matter, to order Each Official
Agency or Other Public Entity that there is Reason to Believe
Records or files Concerning the Charge in cause Number #046500
a. Return All Records and Files Concerning the Arrest to the Court
or if Removal is Impracticable, Obliterate All References to
Petitioner,and
b. Request each Central Federal Depository to which it Supplied
Information Concerning the Charge Agenst Petitioner to return
All Such Records and files to the Court, Or if Removal is
Impracticable to Obliterate ALL References to Petitioner and
Notify the Court of it's Action.
c. Delete from It's public records, All index References to the
Above-Mentioned Charge Against Petitioner.

(4 To Direct the Clerk of the court to send a Certified Copy of
the Order by Certified Mail, Return Receipt requested, To the
Department of Public Safty and to each Official agency or Other
Entity Named on Page 3 of this Petition, and to direct the
Department of public safety to Send to each Centeral Federal
Depository an Explanation of the Effect of the Order as well
as a request for the return or Destruction of the records
held by the Centeral Federal Depository.

page 6
 To return to the Petitioner ALL Records, Files and Notifi-
-cation of the Disposition of records and files returned
to the Court pursuant to it's Expunction Order Within a
reasonable time of receipt of Same.
Wherefore Premises Considered, Applicant Prays that this Expunction
be Granted for Relief.
RESPECTFULLY SUMITTED

.lfd$&~
Michael C.Wade 1571415 Pro-Se
Stevenson unit
1525 Fm 766
Cuero,Texas 77954

page 7
 PROOF OF SERVICE TO ALL PARTIES

The right to Expunction is a Statutory Privilege, All Provisions
Have Been Met.
The Right to Expunction ART 55.01
The Trail Court is Required to Set a Hearing on petition for Expunction
SEE Heine V.Texas D.P.S. 92 S.W.3d 642,649(Tex.App.-Austin 2002).

T~e Expunction Statue Artical 55.01 ET.Seq of the TEXAS Code of
Criminal Procedure does Not Require that the Law Enforcement Agencies
be Served with the Expunction Petition Concevably Because an Expunction
hearing is ~n Exparte Proceedings.
See Barry P.Helft and John M.Schmolesky, Teaxs Criminal Practice Guide
§ 11.03[1] (1996).
However, The Statute does compel the Court to Notify the LAW ENFORCEMENT
AGENTIES LISTED IN THE EXPUNCTION PETITION OF THE EXPUNCTION HEARING.
The Court Shall Set a Hearing on the Matter No Sooner that 30 Day's
from the Filing of the Petion [AND SHALL GIVE REASONABLE NOTICE OF
THE HEARING TO; Each Official or Agency or other Entity Named in
the Petition by Certifyed Mail,Return recipt Requested .... ].
TEXAS.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN.ART SJL02 § 2(Vernon.supp.1997).
The Procedure Listed in artical 55.02 are Mandatory. This Court Has
Jurisdiction because this Agency is the Arresting Agency, By Grayson
I
County Sheriffs Department, Sherman,TEXAS . Which involks Jurisdiction
by Complying with ART 55.02.
It is up to the Clerk to Notify all Parties at this time, Michael
...::C::.!o.h~r,__:i~s~t~o:!.;p~h~e.=..r..l.I.!.!W.£o!a~d~e=------' ~espectfully request~ All parties to be served.

Pu~suant to Texas Rules of Civil Pr6cedure & title 6 Chapter 132 of
the Civil Pratice and Remedies code under Penalty of Perjury,
Excuted on this 17 day of August, 2015.

page 8
COPY ..... . EXHIBIT (C) EXHIBIT( C)

Kelly Ashmore,District Clerk § ExParte District Court
Shleana Brinkley, Deputy Clerk § Michael Wade in the 397 th
Grayson County,Texas § CV-15-1294 Grayson County,TX
§

PETITIONERS RESPONCE TO:SHLEANA BRINKLEYS LETTER.

To Honorable Judge of Said Court:

Now Comes Michael C.Wade Pro-Se for good Cause Shows the
Following:

On September /21/2015. I Received a Letter from you Stating, My Expunct~c<·.

-ion was Filed on Augest 20th,2015 Case Number is CV-15-1294 in the
397 th District Court with Judge Brian Gary.
I would like to bring to the Courts Attention in the Orignal
Petition for Expunction and Proper Documents Meeting the Statutory
Requirement of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 55.01 and 55.02 is
a Right,Not a Prialge. The Charges Requesting to be Expunged was;
Dismissed,NOT GUILTY,Acquitted Verdict Artical 55.01(a).
The Petition for Expunction was in Order with Facts SeeHeine
V.Texas DPS 92 S.W.3d 642,649{Tex.App.Austin 2002).
The Trial Court is Required to set a Hearing on Petition for Expuction.
[I]E You are Claiming,I Still Need to Forward Further Documents for a
Hearing Order. And by the O'Conners Tx.Code of Criminal Procedure, I
Have Met Strict Proof of 55.01 If there is Not a Hearing Required and
a Order to Expunge is Granted to expunge without a Hearing,Petitioner
would be Sa~is~ied.
Petitioner Request a Ruling on Orignal Petition for Expungment, Cause
Number CV-15-1294.
Petitioner Request a More Defined Statement to What Further Documents
would be Needed for a Hearing If Needed.
Petitioner States for the Record that ALL Necassary Documents and Order
was Attached to the Orignal Petition for Expunction of Records.
Wherefore,Premises Considered Petitioner Prays the Orignal Petition
is Ruled on and that a Responce is Provided to this Petitioners Re-
-sponce in STATES LETTER is Responded to.

RESPECTFULLY.

page 1
 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I Hereby Certify that a copy of the Above Responce

to Shleana Brinkleys Letter,Deputy District Clerk

of Grayson County, was Mailed to District Clerk,Kelly
Ashmore at 200 South Crockett Ave, STE 120-A. Sherman,

TEXAS 75090 on this 17th Day of Augest.2015.

Petitioner Pro-Se

Page 2
 ORDER

On This Day Came on to be Heard the Forgoing

Responce to Deputy District Clerks Letter,

Shleana Brinkley and it Appears to the Court

That the Orignal Order for Expuction of Records

be Set for Doccett Call where it can be Ruled

on, It appears to the Court that the same should

be,

____________ GRANTED

Signed on this the __________day of
---------------2015.

Honorable Judge Presiding.
 EXHIBIT(D) EXHIBIT(D)

Kelli Ashmore,District Clerk

Shleana Brinkley,Deputy Clerk

200 south Crockett Ave, STE 120-A
10/15/2015
Sherman,TEXAS 75090

Dear Mrs Kelly Ashmore,

I waul~ like to Know what is Going on with My Expungment order

I Filed with you court ? The Petition was Marked filed on Augest/20/15

by you on ommission but I have yet to hear back from you on that Matter

or the Letter your Deputy Clerk sent Stating i Needed more Paper work

to send to have it set for Court ? Still no responce from your Office

on Either Matter. Could you Please let me Know Something on this Issue

at Hand ?

Thank you,

Michal C. Wade
I
 (E) AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY EXHIBIT( E)

Texas rules of Civil procedure,
title 6,chapter 132,texas civil
Practice and remedies code.

NOW RESPECTFULLY comes Michael C.Wade .T.D.C.J.# 1571415
presently at the Stevenson unit in cuero(dewitt county)Texas,
77954-6300. I declare that I am unable to pay the court cost in
this request to the court, and requests leave of the court to pro-
-ceed- In Forma Pauperis- in this accompanying request and action
while showing the court the following;

(1) I am presently incarcerated in the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice-Correctional Institution Division
where I am not permitted to handle Money; and

(2) I have no Source of income and do not recieve pay;and

(3) I currently have $ 00 .Q2_Dollars Creited to me in the
T.D.C.J. Inmate Trust fund;and

(4) During my incarceration in the texas department of
Criminal Justice - Correctional Institution Division,
I have Approximately $ 00 . 09 Dollars per month as
as Gifts from Relatives and friends,and

(5) I neither own nor have an interest in any realty,stoc~s
bonds or bank accounts, and,I receive no interest or
dividend income from any source;and
(6) I have
-0- -dependants;and
(7) I have total debts of approximately $ 00 ._Q_Q_dollars;
and

(8) I owe$ 00 .00 in restitution;and

(9) My monthly expenses in Hygiene and Medical expenses are
approximately $ 00 ._QQ__ dollars.
!

I, Michael C Wade .T.D.C.J.# 1571415 ,being presently
incarcerated at the Stevenson unit, Located at 1525 FM 766,Cuero,Tx
77954-6300 (361) 257-2075,Declare and Verify under penalty of perjury
that the foregoing statements in this Affidavit of Indigence are True
and Correct.

NOTE:
Amendments to the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies code §132.001,
Now Allows An~ Party to us~ an Vnsworn Declaration instead of an
affidavit or Verification ~2012).

Affidavit of Indigence
Pro Se,Self-Representing Litigant page 8
 EXHIBIT (E) EXHIBIT( E)

~~ ~ .. , ~-- ~~- ~c-----~--:--~-~-~·.·--c---~,---,-.,·~·:~,f.-:;:;t

.ocat_ion •• ,: 0711 - 01 Commissary &Trttst Fund Date: 7/'C"j/15
lalesperson: RC00024 STEVEIGlN UNIT Tiae: 11 :35:12~
CoB&issary Purchase.Receipt Page: I
•urchimr: WAD£, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER Housing: K-2 CELL17
D Nu!Dber: 01571415 Beginning Account Balance: $. 0'3 Begin Spend Limit: t09
tem Nuabe1• Item DPscription Unit Price Quantity Ext.Amt Class Spend Lillit

1 No Records to Print *
Transaction Total: s.oo
Sal~s Tax included in above amount: $.00
Ending Account Balance: $.09 End Spend li~it:

SIGNATUR£: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _THlJ!tiBPRINT _ _ _ _ _ _.
ALL SALES FINAL'~~~~! I I- NO REFUNDS OR EXCHANGES~! I I!!!! I I

page 9