AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed February 25, 2015.
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-01659-CR
No. 05-13-01660-CR
CHRISTOPHER EUGENE ADDISON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F06-63021-Q, F12-71987-Q
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Lang, Stoddart, and Schenck
Opinion by Justice Lang
Christopher Eugene Addison appeals his convictions, following the adjudication of his
guilt, for robbery and assault involving family violence. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN.
§§ 22.01(a)(1), (b)(2), 29.02(a) (West 2011); TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. §§ 71.0021, 71.005 (West
2008 & Supp. 2014). The trial court assessed punishment at five years’ imprisonment for the
robbery and one year’s confinement in the county jail for the assault. On appeal, appellant’s
attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit.
The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief
presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable
grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.]
1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to
file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313,
319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders
cases).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree
the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably
support the appeals.
We affirm the trial court’s judgments.
/ Douglas S. Lang/
DOUGLAS S. LANG
JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
131659F.U05
-2-
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
CHRISTOPHER EUGENE ADDISON, Appeal from the 204th Judicial District
Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
F06-63021-Q).
No. 05-13-01659-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices
Stoddart and Schenck participating.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered February 25, 2015.
-3-
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
CHRISTOPHER EUGENE ADDISON, Appeal from the 204th Judicial District
Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
F12-71987-Q).
No. 05-13-01660-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices
Stoddart and Schenck participating.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered February 25, 2015.
-4-