Shirley Adams, Charlene Burgess, Willie Mae Herbst Jasik, William Albert Herbst, Helen Herbst and R. May Oil & Gas Company, Ltd. v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co.-USA, a Delaware Corporation
ACCEPTED
04-15-00118-CV
FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS
04-15-00118-CV SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
3/3/2015 12:05:21 PM
KEITH HOTTLE
CLERK
CAUSE NO. 13-05-0466-CVA
FILED IN
SHIRLEY ADAMS, CHARLENE IN THE DISTRICT COURT
4th COURT OF APPEALS
BURGESS, WILLIE MAE HERBST SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
JASIK, WILLIAM ALBERT HERBST, 03/3/2015 12:05:21 PM
HELEN HERBST and R. MAY OIL & KEITH E. HOTTLE
Clerk
GAS COMPANY, LTD.,
Plaintiffs,
vs. 218th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
MURPHY EXPLORATION &
PRODUCTION CO.-USA,
A DELAWARE CORPORATION,
efendant.
ATASCOSA COUNTY, TEXAS
IVIi\i',(3A1)1:1. L. lirk.LiON,
FEB 2 5 2015
PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF APPEAL
CO TX
Nita Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.1, PLAINTIFFS
-
SHIRLEY ADAMS, CHARLENE BURGESS, WILLIE MAE HERBST JASIK,
WILLIAM ALBERT HERBST, HELEN HERBST, AND R. MAY OIL & GAS
COMPANY, LTD hereby give notice of their desire to appeal from the Order
Setting Aside Final Judgment In Part and Entering Amended Final Judgment,
which was signed and entered on February 10, 2015, in Civil Cause Number 13-
05-0466-CVA, Shirley Adams, Charlene Burgess, Willie Mae Herbst Jasik,
William Albert Herbst, Helen Herbst and R. May Oil & Gas Company, Ltd. vs.
Murphy Exploration & Production Co. USA, a Delaware Corporation, in the
218th Judicial District Court of Atascosa County, Texas. The appeal is to the
1
Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio, Texas. A copy of the February 10, 2015
Order Setting Aside Final Judgment and Entering Amended Final Judgment In Part
of the Court is attached hereto as Exhibit A. To the extent necessary, Plaintiffs
also appeal any adverse portions of the Final Judgment signed on December 15,
2014 that remain in effect.
Dated: FE-19- c9-o is-- Respectfully submitted,
Joh B. M arland
Sta Bar No. 13598 00
jmcfarland@gdhm.com
Mary A. Keeney
State Bar No. 11170300
miceeney@gdhm.coni
GRAVES, DOUGHERTY, HEARON &
MOODY, P.C.
401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2200
Austin, Texas 78701-3744
(512) 480-5682 Telephone
(512) 480-4882 Telecopier
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on February 24, 2015, a true and correct copy of the
foregoing was served on counsel for Defendant via email as shown below:
Bill Kroger
Jason A. Newman
Benjamin Sweet
Baker Botts L.L.P.
One Shell Plaza
910 Louisiana Street
Houston, Texas 77002-4995
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT MURPHY EXPLORATION &
PRODUCTION COMPANY - USA
Jason.newman@bakerbotts.corn
3
CAUSE NO. 13-05-0466-CVA
SHIRLEY ADAMS, CHARLENE BURGESS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT
WILLIE MAE HERBST JASIK, FILED 01 Iry O'CLOCK P
MARGARET E. LITTLETON, DISTRICT CLERK
WILLIAM ALBERT HERBST,
HELEN HERBST and
R. MAY OIL & GAS COMPANY, LTD., FEB 1 0 2)15
Plaintiffs,
CLERK DISa
TRICT cjit
vs. 218th JUDICIAL )3
MURPHY EXPLORATION &
PRODUCTION CO.-USA,
A DELAWARE CORPORATION,
Defendant.
ATASCOSA COUNTY, TEXAS
I TN PART' --
ORDER SETTING ASIDE FINAL. JUDGMENT AND ENTERING
AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT
On February 2, 2015, came on to be considered the Motion for New Trial, Motion to
Vacate or Modify the Judgment, and Motion to Reconsider the Court's Decision on Partial
Summgy Judgment Motions, filed by Plaintiffs Shirley Adams, Chatlene Burgess, Willie Mae
Herbst Jasik, William Albert Herbst, Helen Herbst, and R. May Oil & Gas Company, Ltd. The
Court has considered the motions, the response filed by Murphy Exploration & Production Co.-
USA, and the arguments presented by counsel and is of the opinion that Plaintiffs' motions
To-via ev‘octitPeot:A
should be granted in part encklenied in parlor the following rdsons:
--1-:-----The-Bek,umber-r57201-4-Ftrrai-.1adgrnent-was-presented-te4he-Goout
....piaper....notice-to-P-laintiffsrin-vial-ation-of-Texasitutrofeivii-Freeeelure-a057-
•2. The December 15, 2014 Final Judgment improperly awards appellate attorney's
fees to Murphy. -'11e-G•ikuct-finds-that-these-ftes-axe-net-reso-vezable-tinder-either-C--hapter-3-7-or-
-Chathe-Texas-Givil-Praetiee-&-Renteclies-Goele,The-C-ortherfm:dsthatit-woultl-
-41e-neitherequitable-:norjust-to-aw-artl-these-fees7-The-eu t-further-finds-that-these-fees-are-not-
2250162.1
Rviek 306(56w-v.i"
The Court vacates and modifies its 44,41e* in part with regard to the award of appellate fees to
Murphy. The Court modifies paragraph 3 of its December 15, 2014 final judgment in this matter
and finds that should Plaintiffs appeal this Final Judgment, Murphy will expend reasonable and
necessary attorneys' fees in the amount of $25,000 for defending the matter in the Court of
Appeals, $7500 for responding to a petition for review, and $20,000 in the event the Supreme
Court orders briefmg n the meats and grants the petition. Therefore, should Plaintiffs
unsuccessfully appeal thisAtinal Judgment, they are ordered to pay Murphy's reasonable and
necessary attorney's fees on appeal as directed in this judgment.
3, The Court finds that its rulings on Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment and Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment should stand.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs' Motion for New Trial, Motion to
ovt-
Vacate or Modify the Judgment, and Motion to Reconsider the Court's Decision 40 Partial
Summary Judgment Motions is denied, except that the December 15, 2014 Final Judgment in
this case is vacated and modified solely with regard to paragraph 3 as reflected in this order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is
DENIED AND Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
Costs are taxed against Plaintiffs.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other relief requested in this cause is DENIED.
SIGNED this 10th day of February, 2015.
ELLA SAXON, Judge Presiding