Jones, Lydell Anton

PD -011&~ 15 LYDE1L ANTON J0NE5 VS. STATC OF TEXA»»*0s^ C/6i '/* PETlTTnMF.Pi^MnTTQM FORMrtEAAlMA PETITIONER LYftELL ANTON TONER, GnftMTT THIS MOTION FOR R&IEARTN& IN RESPONSE TO THE RE FUSAL ISSUED BYTf^CRTMINAL COURT OF APP EALS QNMQVa\ABf:R^anmAMD requests the COURT TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING XSSI! ES J -r*,ler A n, ISSUES PRCfiEM-TED FOft ftftlffiFU/ StI^;?1^* CfiWtf^AlMtSTHAT. HIS FbaftTH AMENDMENT PROPLfrTV T/OTEAeST AJfif??W^:9ntAKr '^A$ VIOLATED, DUETO THE OPENING OF PETITIONER'S TOtST- £<-MS MAIL R/rrHOUT t-LCS CONSENT' AlSto PETTTIOMPR (Y)MO/TtS -tha* Vui T^M^^^!^^riKrtZ uACANiN£ ALERTING 7D APACKAGE PfiKftAfti WDBAbLL f CAUSE r^r TO™?,|y*KSi5TAT1Sfl P03TAL SBKVT.CE IS ONLY SEEK AZEAPCU WARRANT* mSSUEl ft : PETITXONCR CQMPlAXNES HE. WAS £a£>ttCT£.D TO XVEffECTXVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, DUE TO TRIAL ATTOAflEV FAZLXNI& TO FIL£ .A" ENTMfiUEUT MOTION IW ATrMELY MANNER SER)A£ THE TRIAL DA7E. SEFEA TO COa«T R&MTSfiS ftecDao cvoi,3,pa9 V, WASMlAl&TOM^kk U,£, kkft (iqg4) THE SIXTH yWlEA/OA/lEW T guarantees the rh&ht td elective assistaxice coursel. PACl 1 ARAUKAFMT X, AirrHnfttTTF.fi XSSIip A Kofev.UtoH^Sfafe^.aM ha *Nfi ^^ HELD THAT ^LOCKED CBUTwfi^DVC^T^£^A^IPr^lMAV^^^^ OBJECT THE POLICE 5TXTPn^^,^¥,LA^i^?U^ ^ CDimiN THB LESS R^TSSSCH- At LS^ S7uror ^I¥ SA,ME PiAt3B^FTC« AFfiUrT MXUANDDEHM^ DEFENDANT'S (^^^TeMS4$7if^P °N ^ ASSOMPTTON THAT PA0a£ 9l AflGdJMEATT £ AlITHOKLTBES COMTTNliXNlfl ISSUE A^i^ SEAftg.tt nr^Aii .PArt^AftRfi .a^e protected '8 Y THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, FDUftTH AMENDMENT STATES THAT PWPIJE TN THE UNITED STATES Rl&UTS AftE PROTECTED XN THEIR PE^SDMS.rtOtises.PAPCftS, AMD EFFECTS. XNCLUDIM& PACK* AG£S TMAT HAVE BEEN hAMLED TAJ THE UHITED 5TATE5 US ~ ING THE UNITEDSTATES POSTAL SEtWICE >AMDTHATTtf£ f&CKA&E 15 STXLL PROTECTED (EfiPSCXALLy WHEN STILL ^ALJED) UWD£a THIS AMWDMEKh; SecAi.S.C.A 12i ITQ3motbh) n$S2£Sy?2LA Jffr^S6s|Llifi&AGE.Oft PACKAGE IS AfOdEAftCH fiEOWte ^^^n^^r^TPJP^-^E WOULD tfEMAlfc) HIDDEN FRAMW £££*&SUMMONH) POUZE HAD OWNED THE PACKA«£ to TH6 SAME EVTCAJT S/T 7flO/ Mte A%Sw?A^jStj^^^o^^ S^^ TO ™e OBJECT" TTB&F AMWMFUT & AHTHnp,-riTH XSS6IE 6 LQiMJcr 50MfcTT^LLE^IlTOBJ7M^r«JT Mftrfr RftSE'3 AftfillMPMT & AlfrtfflftTTTES THE SUPREME CDUOT MAS HELD TttAT TECHNIQUES 0F EN- COUttA&EAAENT NAM MOT REACH THE POINT WHERE THEV CftN 5 - TTTUTE«BJTftAPMlNT^: IFTHEY DaTHE PRESENCE QTEJir iBBHiaiT (MsiinnES A DOTNSE TD THE DEF^DfiNrS OTHERWISE CRIMINAL ACT, PETITIONER WAS CALLED &Y A UNITED STATE POSTAL XN SPECTOft TD COME flE - CIEVETHE AAlMPiW OHCB DELIVERED PACKAGE. THE EX ACT DEFINITION Qf ENTftAPMgMT IS A MAlTEP, AFQrS- PUTEjBirTlT CLEANLY INCLUDES THE SITUATION IW WHICH cc THE CRIMINAL DESITnK) Dm&mhTES WITH THE [POLICE A^fi) And rtey implant in the mind dfam inno&mt P&Sdh we DISPOSITION TD COMMIT7H£ 0ff8jSE AND TtitiaCE ITS • CD/MISSION IN ORDEft THAT THE/MAY PMSWlTE? fault. .PRAYER PORTHE RE/feoKiS STATED IN THIS MOTION, PETTTIDNEfv ASKS THE COtfTTO (mm THIS MOTIdW fltf\ REHEAKCN&. SET THE CASE FOfi 0*Ai ARfiUMEWT, AMDAFlEAARGdlMaJTSuSTAlM PETTHbhERS ISSUES PflES£AJTEC> f*?ft fiEl/aBW, REVERE THeaiiDGEMOslTOFTHE'ffilALCDUftT, AHb ORDER A NEW TtflAU J P^fULLY ^SUBMITTED 5/DELL AlS)TqjjSrnDM£5 PETITIONEH PflO-SE TDCT:H:I4D£33S M.H.dlDFFIELb UNIT T£mES this j ^ DAy op dexm&zrsob. Re^^TPULLV SO&Mina) LVCELLANTBS4TOMES TbCftfc l^DQ538 PETTTmNER Pfl06£ H.H.CDFFIELn UNIT 7BMESSEE CDUM}tTW& 15U4 pd - ona.- 15 ftMMii.fll-ia-flPfft LVPfcU. ANTPN flPHEft . State ot texas CERTTfTCATE nr fiflnn TATTU xlvdell Anton mf^ , pErraaNEft in the above- styled cause num6H\5,Certifies that the fOREGraflfi motion rw KEl-iEAKD\16 IS DONE XN 6O0D FAITV\ And M&i-ftirdeJay, PETIT IONER IS iNCAfiCEftATEA IN THE 7EKA5 DE^KTA/IENT DP C8IM- BJALXaSTlCE -CID At H.H.COFFIELD LIMIT IN ANDER30X) LDUNTY, DECLARES THAT THE EflflEGOINEr IS 7RUE MD CDflRECT UNDER PEkIALtV OF PEtfJURV.EVECUieD THIS123^ DAV OF DUM BER obS5« M)£LL ANTOfj>CIDhlES M.M.CDTFTELD UNIT TD£T# I40,353X f^TTTiDNEft ^°^ <36L>t R4JA54