IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-83,901-01
EX PARTE CHUNG KIM, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. W13-52168-U(A) IN THE 291ST DISTRICT COURT
FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital murder
and sentenced to imprisonment for life without parole. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his
conviction. Kim v. State, No. 05-14-00138-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Apr. 29, 2015) (not designated
for publication).
Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance
because did not request or provide a translator.
2
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Cockrell, 424 S.W.3d 543 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). In these
circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The
trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the
appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the
performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient
performance prejudiced Applicant. Ex parte Cockrell, 424 S.W.3d 543, 554–57 (Tex. Crim. App.
2014). The trial court shall make specific findings of fact addressing Applicant’s claims that the
language barrier prevented him from telling his side of the story, and whether he understood the
proceedings against him. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions
of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas
corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
3
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
be obtained from this Court.
Filed: November 11, 2015
Do not publish