Entergy Texas, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas, Office of Public Utility Counsel, and Texas Industrial Energy Consumers

ACCEPTED 03-14-00709-CV 5166900 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/6/2015 8:46:45 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK No. 03-14-00709-CV IN THE FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS AT AUSTIN 5/6/2015 8:46:45 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE ENTERGY TEXAS, INC., Clerk Appellant, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS, Appellee. Appeal from the 53rd Judicial District Court, Travis County, Texas The Honorable Amy Clark Meachum, Judge Presiding ________________________________________________________________ APPELLANT ENTERGY TEXAS, INC.’S ORAL ARGUMENT EXHIBIT _________________________________________________________________ John F. Williams State Bar No. 21554100 jwilliams@dwmrlaw.com Marnie A. McCormick State Bar No. 00794264 mmccormick@dwmrlaw.com DUGGINS WREN MANN & ROMERO, LLP 600 Congress Ave., Ste. 1900 (78701) P. O. Box 1149 Austin, Texas 78767-1149 (512) 744-9300 (512) 744-9399 fax ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. May 2015 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE As required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5, I certify that on the 6th day of May, 2015, the foregoing document was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the electronic case filing system of the Court, and that a true and correct copy was served on the following lead counsel for all parties listed below via electronic service: Elizabeth R. B. Sterling Megan M. Neal Environmental Protection Division Office of the Attorney General P.O. Box 12548 Austin, TX 78711-2548 Counsel for the Public Utility Commission of Texas Rex VanMiddlesworth Benjamin Hallmark Thompson & Knight LLP 98 San Jacinto Blvd., Ste. 1900 Austin, TX 78701 Counsel for Texas Industrial Energy Consumers Sara J. Ferris Office of Public Utility Counsel 1701 N. Congress Ave., Ste. 9-180 P.O. Box 12397 Austin, TX 78711-2397 Counsel for Office of Public Utility Counsel /s/ Marnie A. McCormick Marnie A. McCormick The CGS Statute as Enacted … The tariffs subject to this subsection may not be considered to offer a discounted rate or rates under Section 36.007, and the utility's rates shall be set, in the proceeding in which the tariff is adopted, to recover any costs unrecovered as a result of the implementation of the tariff. … Tex. Util. Code Ann. § 39.452(b) (emphasis added). The CGS Statute as Interpreted by the PUC … The tariffs subject to this subsection may not be considered to offer a discounted rate or rates under Section 36.007, and the utility's rates shall be set, in the proceeding in which the tariff is adopted, to recover any costs unrecovered as a result of the implementation of the tariff. … The Energy Efficiency Statute at Issue in CenterPoint, 354 S.W.3d 899 (Tex. App. – Austin 2011, no pet.) (b) The commission shall provide oversight and adopt rules and procedures to ensure that the utilities can achieve the goal of this section, including: (1) establishing an energy efficiency cost recovery factor for ensuring timely and reasonable cost recovery for utility expenditures made to satisfy the goal of this section; … (b-1) The energy efficiency cost recovery factor under Subsection (b)(1) may not result in an over-recovery of costs but may be adjusted each year to change rates to enable utilities to match revenues against energy efficiency costs and any incentives to which they are granted. The factor shall be adjusted to reflect any over-collection or under-collection of energy efficiency cost recovery revenues in previous years. Tex. Util. Code Ann. § 39.905 (emphasis added).