Nexion Health at Beechnut, Inc., D/B/A Beechnut Manor v. Maria Moreno, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Mario Moreno

ACCEPTED 01-15-00793-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/29/2015 3:19:12 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK NO. 01-15-00793-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FILED IN 1"1 JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HOUSTON 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/29/2015 3:19:12 PM Nexiofl Health at Beechnut, Inc. v. Maria Moreno, Individually and A. CHRISTOPHER asPRINE Representative of the Estate of Mario Moreno Clerk On Appeal From the 133rd Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas Cause No. 2015-01975 APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS TO THE HONORABLE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS: MARIA MORENO, Individually and as Representative of the ESTATE OF MARIO MORENO ("Appellee") files this Motion to Dismiss to NEXION AT BEECHNUT, INC., D/B/A BEECHNUT MANOR's ("Appellant") Notice of Appeal, and would respectfully show the following: I. BRIEF FACTS 1. Mario Moreno ("Moreno") died from a traumatic head injury suffered in Appellant's long-term care facility for the cognitively impaired. It was well known to Appellant's staff Moreno suffered from impaired balance, impaired cognition and exhibited exit seeking behaviors. 2. However, on May 23, 2013 and again on May 29, 2013, Moreno was permitted to elope from his room, fall and incur injuries requiring hospitalization. After the May 29, 2013 fall, Moreno remained in and out of consciousness until he died from his injuries on May 30, 2013. 11. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 3. Subsequently, Appellee filed suit against Appellant on January 14, 2015. Appellee timely served Appellant with Chapter 74 expert reports for Dr. Donald Marks and Rhonda Ratterman on February 23, 2015. 4. On August 24, 2015 the trial court heard Appellant's Chapter 74 Motion to Dismiss regarding the reports. After reviewing the pleadings, the evidence and arguments by counsel the trial court denied Appellant's Chapter 74 Motion to Dismiss. 1 5. Appellant filed a Notice of Interlocutory Appeal on September 14, 2015 2 and filed a request for Clerk's Record and Reporter's Record the same day. The Clerk's Record and Reporter's Record were due September 24, 2015, ten (10) days from the date the Notice of Appeal was filed. 3 To date, 1 See Exhibit 1: Order Denying Nexion at Beechnut, lnc.'s Motion to Dismiss. 2 See Exhibit 2: Nexion at Beechnut, lnc.'s Notice of Interlocutory Appeal;. 3 See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1(b). 2 five days after the deadline, the Clerk's Record and Reporter's Record have not been filed with the Appellate Clerk because of Appellant's failure to pay. 111. MOTION TO DISMISS 6. When the trial clerk fails to timely file the record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal on a party's motion, or on its own initiative. 4 On September 29, 2015, five days after the deadline to file the record, the trial clerk informed Appellee the record has not been filed due to lack of payment. 7. Appellant, as the movant, has the responsibility to pay the clerk's fee or make arrangements to do so. As a result of Appellant's failure to pay or make arrangements to pay, the record has not been timely filed. Therefore, Appellee asks the Court to dismiss Appellant's Notice of Appeal for a failure to file a record pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). IV. PRAYER 8. Appellee respectfully requests the First Court of Appeals to DISMISS Appellant's Notice of Appeal and for all other relief, both in law and equity, to which they may be entitled. 4 See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). 3 Respectfully Submitted, THE GIBSON LAW F"IRM Jason A. Gibson State Bar No. 24000606 Casey L. Jordan State Bar No. 24090599 The Lyric Centre 440 Louisiana, Suite 2400 Houston, Texas 77002 Ph: (713) 650-1010 Fax: (713) 650-1011 ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE CERTIFICATION OF FACTS I have reviewed the above Motion to Dismiss. I certify every factual statement is supported by competent evidence included in the record. Casey L. Jordan 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify a true and correct copy of this document has been served on all counsel of record via first class regular mail or fax on September 29, 2015. Casey L. Jordan 5 EXHIBIT 1 Cause No 2016-01976-133 vC~. MARIO MORENO, lndMdually § and as Representative oftlta ESTATE § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF y OF MARIO MORENO § § § i i v § § § NEXION HEALTH AT BEECHNUT, INC , § dlb/a BEECHNUT MANOR § 133111 JUDICIAL DISTRI ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT NEXION AT BEECHNUT, INC DIB/A BEECHNUT MANOR'S CHAP1ER 74 MOTION TO D!SMJSS The Court heard Defendant's Chapter 74 Mobon to D1amtas After reviewing 1he pleadings, the evidence and arguments by counsel, If any, the Court OEN/ES Defendanrs Chapter 74 Motion to Dusm1ss SIGNED ON tLwJ.u..ib 91± I 2015 Exhibit A··· EXHIBIT 2 9114120151:13:17 PM Chris Danlel - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 69092BB By; Phyllis Washington Filed: 9114120151:13:17 PM NO. 2015-01975-133 MARIA MORENO, Individually and as § IN THE DISTRICT COURT Representative of the Estate of Mario § Moreno, § § Plaintiff, § § ~ § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS § NEXIONHEALTHATBEECHNUT, INC., § d/b/a Beechnut Manor § § Defendant. § 133r<1 JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND NOTICE OF AUTOMATIC TRIAL STAY TO THE HONORABLE COURT: Please take notice that, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 (b), Defendant Nexion Health at Beechnut Inc. d/b/a Beechnut Manor ("Beechnut") desires to appeal to the First or Fourteenth District Court of Appeals at Houston, Texas, the trial court's August 24, 2015 Order denying Beechnut's Chapter 74 Motion to Dismiss. See Attachment "A." Such Order is subject to an accelerated interlocutory appeal. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code§ 51.014(a)(9); Tex. R. App. P. 28.1. This notice of appeal is timely filed within twenty days after the trial court's Order was signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.l(b). As required by the Local Rules Relating to Assignment of Related Cases to· and Transfers of Related Cases between the First and Fourteenth Courts of Appeals, I certify that no other related appeal or original proceeding has been previously filed in either the First or Fourteenth Court of Appeals. Further, please tal