Jimmy Diaz v. Robert T. Rice and Savannah Robinson

FILED IN OF APPEALS N.TEXAS -hoifdMiniuik AW JUL?A'L I CHRISTOPHER A. PR1NE r — •*• 1/5, i, typ&ll m\hoci2/J hgiht stoWte herd* tkma Liftfc K/n Sf\C, ulhdiu Ouriwri'/btpralm torn ofAppals d\ tol fanm siik J% fats™ iez*s Wool, fori*** Ate prtjudi^td pwiMlniptoW iwnnj o^adiquhk dui pfiocxs ouhl foul m&m\ptol&ihon of/w ok opportunity h h£ IAkt tobeAHwoK Raa ht 5WMM on 1 X mA s^k re.ltif Min H/fa^ WPmlhd H£, $hd£jodtfn+ yikhk odetsflo months tillfatifoi/o, hdikiXiz respondVtdmbtkliUnh Udmkf 3. « /)/& zM& h Comply U/iib ihllflu) of <3mt Qf\m£. S7m£ tgc liAi* of Ctt V?Mtj moTI^J lb ^ "JWrtfc,, AtoT/oO £* find W\ hk ShoulM^iijAmdarrimf ^ t& wad fo# tidBf rn'ifio'ifYkrMl wxfioiKk! Styrrk- (bnidikH Qltidi'nqs; ioi\ Slfemhit d6i Qottj m^dfink mo/6 fat morion fee. Swm/nrt<^ 'Sutyfot^ Iha/jIrtlM isbi/kW Pw\siim Qua of taw* tkinki ,im and j^mudml bed*fa*«tS (LOt in molmm i&ns vemss.m.i&fSLwii %is fMiffMR. ht^kt mid %HS Itomnv mot finite ty nit^^hii[k§go *