MOTION DENIED s ^CV^ UQ^^vk
Mof-t&U foT^K^ C/DkTFLjcP\ u c-e_ oka §0UOTOFCW|^AP?eJ!
&Pruccxor.t6U^ rae, uoe_irs> of H^fo^c^ nrr o« m«
Gue-Pus cnj^e, k^sO&Ho3aL\S-aC^; uu«J 6 2015
RPPLtCxtuT NCsiK£6t L_Oj\\\ m*viS I3l2_ X»4 TME P\(W^e. CjfiAT±oki
mcA/€Js' Thus ccjo\lx rc Ft^o Tne 3icH\vi" Cirb.rr.xzLr c^^cjv
FiLom £hi\as CooKiTS ukA mo u GouPLjcAkice ofTkc
CJDKJtSSt^ OfcXteG. ISSUED OM ftf(LXL ^°1 , 30 i^" P>KiC XK
SuPPcjgT OFF^S THE FoLLouoXrpG,
avou 'OCTDk^k SM.aoiM TKt ST<\TFf^P^W oc^e£_
-UC(\i IOO£Tl9l-U£fV^ TME COuiLT FjtwdlS'THftT
O^T£oV^e_XtD Pfc>ev-POu£LH uu exsoWeo f~F Uao3 . ft-PP.-V-XXjcuaT Ho^ KIGT (be,d_£X Vb & ""
• kio itf^Fo(UYvxticU £K\£>r caTrivAG THat Tvi&
ST-ftre £muesY^C> a u UXt e f\ ->tq i4 of TXiwe.
RPPl_____mT" PiLftH THftT Tvix^ GoaCT GjlAjJT
U_s rvsoTx<3i4 i^kiO fiuO IHe SftF Oastr_J
CouCT _» JOOKi GoklPLtftkl^EL OfTH3__ cootT
OL.De.e_., I t THt cooi_X L.ul_E __iQ fr>S rauot
HrVeaLs T£> £jwoi__le Q^F Cbstfctrit-
•UjmiLe.f_._-e jFVe-v_____ VFwxMG feiUl v
^usape&ed F\PP__^mT VWFlM V>amS
IHAT UD OTH__2. 0&sn_uOT:__*\ &E ^U^eiF
TKar^V^^ S*fe ^V4TiLM fttfO
pn
S3
".•«.
XF^tT
Pi
:f?' IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NOS. WR-4?,062-0.>; Wk-49,062-04
EX PARTE GEORGE L. WILLIAMS, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NOS. W08-62218-U(A); W10-00781-U(A)
IN'THE 291st DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
O R D E R
.Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the.Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. _Ex
parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App; 1967). Applicant was convicted ofthe offense
of compelling prostitution of a child less than 17ycfttrs ofage in two cause numbers and sentenced
to imprisonment for life in one cause;and twenty years' imprisonment in the other cause. TheFifth
Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Williams v. State, 05-11-01729-CR; 05-12-00007-CR
(Tex. App.-—Dallas Aug. 2, 2013,pet. ref'd)(not designated for publication).
On October 24, 2014, an order designating Issues was. signed by the trial court, but ho
affidavits or findings offact have been forwarded to this Court with theapplications. It appears that
the trial court has not completed its fact-finding. We remand these spp^^to^l^^^
Court of Dallas County to allow the trial judge^complete an^dentJagri^tigtiMia^^
findings of fact and conclusions of law.
These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues!
The issues shall be resolved within 90 days ofthi? order. Asupplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription ofu^court reporter's notes from any hearing or.
deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings offact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days ofUpdate ofthis order. Any extensions oftime shall
be obtained from this Court. ]
Filed: April 29, 2015 . - ,j .„ • *
Do not p'UDiisu " .:<- *-