Williams, George

MOTION DENIED s ^CV^ UQ^^vk Mof-t&U foT^K^ C/DkTFLjcP\ u c-e_ oka §0UOTOFCW|^AP?eJ! &Pruccxor.t6U^ rae, uoe_irs> of H^fo^c^ nrr o« m« Gue-Pus cnj^e, k^sO&Ho3aL\S-aC^; uu«J 6 2015 RPPLtCxtuT NCsiK£6t L_Oj\\\ m*viS I3l2_ X»4 TME P\(W^e. CjfiAT±oki mcA/€Js' Thus ccjo\lx rc Ft^o Tne 3icH\vi" Cirb.rr.xzLr c^^cjv FiLom £hi\as CooKiTS ukA mo u GouPLjcAkice ofTkc CJDKJtSSt^ OfcXteG. ISSUED OM ftf(LXL ^°1 , 30 i^" P>KiC XK SuPPcjgT OFF^S THE FoLLouoXrpG, avou 'OCTDk^k SM.aoiM TKt ST<\TFf^P^W oc^e£_ -UC(\i IOO£Tl9l-U£fV^ TME COuiLT FjtwdlS'THftT O^T£oV^e_XtD Pfc>ev-POu£LH uu exsoWeo f~F Uao3 . ft-PP.-V-XXjcuaT Ho^ KIGT (be,d_£X Vb & "" • kio itf^Fo(UYvxticU £K\£>r caTrivAG THat Tvi& ST-ftre £muesY^C> a u UXt e f\ ->tq i4 of TXiwe. RPPl_____mT" PiLftH THftT Tvix^ GoaCT GjlAjJT U_s rvsoTx<3i4 i^kiO fiuO IHe SftF Oastr_J CouCT _» JOOKi GoklPLtftkl^EL OfTH3__ cootT OL.De.e_., I t THt cooi_X L.ul_E __iQ fr>S rauot HrVeaLs T£> £jwoi__le Q^F Cbstfctrit- •UjmiLe.f_._-e jFVe-v_____ VFwxMG feiUl v ^usape&ed F\PP__^mT VWFlM V>amS IHAT UD OTH__2. 0&sn_uOT:__*\ &E ^U^eiF TKar^V^^ S*fe ^V4TiLM fttfO pn S3 ".•«. XF^tT Pi :f?' IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-4?,062-0.>; Wk-49,062-04 EX PARTE GEORGE L. WILLIAMS, Applicant ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. W08-62218-U(A); W10-00781-U(A) IN'THE 291st DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam. O R D E R .Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the.Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. _Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App; 1967). Applicant was convicted ofthe offense of compelling prostitution of a child less than 17ycfttrs ofage in two cause numbers and sentenced to imprisonment for life in one cause;and twenty years' imprisonment in the other cause. TheFifth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Williams v. State, 05-11-01729-CR; 05-12-00007-CR (Tex. App.-—Dallas Aug. 2, 2013,pet. ref'd)(not designated for publication). On October 24, 2014, an order designating Issues was. signed by the trial court, but ho affidavits or findings offact have been forwarded to this Court with theapplications. It appears that the trial court has not completed its fact-finding. We remand these spp^^to^l^^^ Court of Dallas County to allow the trial judge^complete an^dentJagri^tigtiMia^^ findings of fact and conclusions of law. These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues! The issues shall be resolved within 90 days ofthi? order. Asupplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription ofu^court reporter's notes from any hearing or. deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings offact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days ofUpdate ofthis order. Any extensions oftime shall be obtained from this Court. ] Filed: April 29, 2015 . - ,j .„ • * Do not p'UDiisu " .:<- *-