Kelly R. Ginn, Green-Span Profiles, L.P., Green-Span Management, L.L.C., Green-Span Enterprises, Inc., and BKG Investments, L.L.C. v. NCI Building Systems, Inc.

y MANDATE Court of Appeals First District of Texas NO. 01-12-00502-CV KELLY R. GINN, GREEN-SPAN PROFILES, L.P., GREEN-SPAN MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., GREEN-SPAN ENTERPRISES, INC., AND BKG INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., Appellants/Cross-Appellees V. NCI BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee/Cross-Appellant Appeal from the 11th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2009-35831). TO THE 11TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS: Before this Court, on the 13th day of August 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words: This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on February 20, 2012. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The Court orders that the appellants/cross-appellees, Kelly R. Ginn, Green-Span Profiles, L.P., Green-Span Management, L.L.C., Green-Span Enterprises, Inc., and BKG Investments, L.L.C., jointly and severally, pay one half of the appellate costs. The Court orders that the appellee/cross-appellant, NCI Building Systems, Inc., pay one half of the appellate costs. The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance. Judgment rendered August 13, 2015. Panel consists of Justices Jennings and Higley. * Opinion delivered by Justice Jennings. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. October 23, 2015 Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK OF THE COURT * The Honorable Jim Sharp, former Justice of this Court, was a member of the Panel and present for argument when this case was actually submitted. Because his term expired on December 31, 2014, he did not participate in the decision of the case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.1(b) (“After argument, if for any reason a member of the panel cannot participate in deciding a case, the case may be decided by the two remaining justices.”).