ACCEPTED
14-15-00614-cv
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
HOUSTON, TEXAS
10/19/2015 8:49:00 AM
CHRISTOPHER PRINE
CLERK
No. 14-15-00614-CV
FILED IN
14th COURT OF APPEALS
HOUSTON, TEXAS
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
10/19/2015 8:49:00 AM
FOR THE FOURTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Clerk
__________________________________________________________
MAXIM CRANE WORKS, L.P.,
Appellant
V.
BERKEL & COMPANY CONTRACTORS, INC.
Appellee
Appeal from the 149th Judicial District Court
Brazoria County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 75576-CV
__________________________________________________________
MAXIM CRANE WORKS, L.P’S RESPONSE TO
BERKEL & COMPANY CONTRACTORS, INC.’S
MOTION TO ABATE
__________________________________________________________
Jeffrey L. Diamond
State Bar No. 05802500
Ann E. Knight
State Bar No. 00786026
1010 N. San Jacinto Street
Houston, Texas 77002
Tel: (713) 227-6800
Fax: (713) 227-6801
jeffrey@ jdiamondandassociates.com
ann@jdiamondandassociates.com
TO THE HONORABLE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS:
Appellant, Maxim Crane Works, L.P., (“Maxim”) files this, its response to Appellee,
Berkel Company Contractors, Inc. (Berkel’s”) Motion to Abate, and respectfully shows the
Court as follows:
I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND FACTS
The underlying lawsuit arises out of a personal injury which was sustained by Plaintiff on
September 30, 2013, as a result of being struck by a piece of equipment at a jobsite in Houston,
Harris County, Texas. At the time of the incident, Plaintiff was employed by Skanska USA
Building Inc., the general contractor, who had retained BERKEL, a subcontractor, to provide
construction services, including the installation of Auger Cast Piles. In order to provide the
construction services at the jobsite, BERKEL rented a Link-Belt crawler crane form MAXIM
pursuant to a Bare Rental Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Agreement”). At the time of the
incident, BERKEL was operating the crane to perform deep foundation drilling and installation
of the piles when the boom collapsed and the auger and leads broke and struck Plaintiff.
The Bare Rental Agreement between MAXIM and BERKEL contained an indemnity
clause which was subject to, and specifically referenced, Chapter 151 of the Texas Insurance
Code, commonly referred to as the Texas Anti Indemnity Statute. Maxim filed a cross-action
against Berkel on or about June 12, 2014, for breach of that Agreement and for recovery of its
defense costs, and the same was subsequently amended on December 17, 2014. (See Exhibit “A”
attached hereto.)
Maxim’s Motion for Entry of Judgment and Supplemental Motion for Entry of Judgment
on its cross-claim against BERKEL (See Exhibits “B” and “C” attached hereto), were denied in
the Amended Final Judgment, signed on July 1st 2015 (See Exhibit “D” attached hereto). On July
2
16, 2015, Maxim filed its Notice of Appeal from a Final Judgment signed on June 17, 2015, and
the Amended Judgment signed on July 1st 2015. Subsequently, on August 31, 2015, BERKEL
filed a Motion to Abate Maxim’s Appeal on the grounds that Maxim’s Appeal was not ripe.
BERKEL also filed a Motion for New Trial and Objections to the Amended Judgment which
were heard on August 31, 2015. The Motion for New Trial was denied but the objections to the
Amended Judgment were granted and, as a result of same, a Final Judgment was entered on
September 16, 2015 (See Exhibit “E” attached hereto). BERKEL filed its Notice of Appeal on
September 16, 2015.
II. MAXIM’S APPEAL IS RIPE
Maxim has filed an appeal on the denial of its cross-claim against BERKEL and is
seeking the Court’s guidance on the interpretation and application of Chapter 151, of The Texas
Insurance Code, specifically, Sections 151.102.and 151.103.
Pursuant to Section 151.102, of The Texas Insurance Code, Maxim is of the opinion that
it is entitled to a reimbursement of its attorney’s fees under the Bare Rental Agreement on a
pro-rata percentage consistent with the Jury’s Verdict. BERKEL, on the other hand, is of the
opinion that since MAXIM was assigned a percentage of fault by the jury, then it is not entitled
to reimbursement under the Bare Rental Agreement and Section 151.102, of any of its
attorney’s fees. This issue is clearly ripe for appeal, since it is a matter of interpretation of the
Statute, Chapter 15, Texas Insurance Code, and is not contingent on the outcome of
BERKEL’S Appeal, noticed on September 16, 2015.
With respect to Section 151.103 of The Texas Insurance Code, MAXIM is of the
opinion that it is entitled to full defense and indemnity from BERKEL (pursuant to the
Agreement and Section 151.103) in the event that BERKEL is successful on its Appeal. In
3
other words, if Plaintiffs’ Judgment against BERKEL is determined to be barred, based on the
exclusive remedy defense of the Texas Worker’s Compensation Scheme, MAXIM is of the
opinion that Section 151.103, provides that MAXIM is entitled to full defense and indemnity
from BERKEL. Although BERKEL will argue that this issue is contingent on the outcome of
its appeal on the merits of this case, that is not the case since the appeal issue to be decided is a
matter of interpretation of the Statute, Chapter 15, Texas Insurance Code, and how it should be
applied in this instance.
III. CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, Maxim Crane Works, L.P. respectfully requests that this
Court deny BERKEL’s Motion to abate this case in its entirety.
Respectfully submitted,
J. DIAMOND AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC
/s/ Ann E. Knight
Jeffrey L. Diamond
State Bar No. 05802500
Ann E. Knight
State Bar No. 00786026
1010 N. San Jacinto Street
Houston, Texas 77002
Tel: (713) 227-6800
Fax: (713) 227-6801
jeffrey@ jdiamondandassociates.com
ann@jdiamondandassociates.com
Attorneys for Defendants:
Maxim Crane Works, L.P., and James Davidson
4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the forgoing instrument was served upon
all known counsel of record via facsimile, hand delivery, and/or certified mail, return receipt
requested, on the 16th day of October, 2015.
Kurt B. Arnold Justin Gilbert
ARNOLD & ITKIN GILBERT & FUREY
6009 Memorial Drive 222 North Velasco Street
Houston, TX 77007 Angleton, TX 77515
Charles Lloyd Clay, Jr. Russell S. Post
CHUCK CLAY & ASSOCIATES, LLC. BECK REDDEN LLP
3280 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 2050 1221 McKinney, Suite 4500
Atlanta, GA 30305 Houston, TX 77010
Andrew T. McKinney IV Thomas C. Wright
D. Douglas Mena Jessica Z. Barger
LITCHFIELD CAVO LLP Garrett A. Gibson
One Riverway, Suite 1000 WRIGHT & CLOSE, LLP.
Houston, TX 77056 One Riverway, Suite 2200
Houston, Texas 77056
John Dwyer Steven D. Selbe
GORDON & REES, LLP GORDON & REES, LLP
633 West Fifth Street, 52nd Floor 1900 West Loop South, Suite 1000
Los Angeles, CA 90071 Houston, TX 77027
Christopher Pine Christopher Pine
Clerk, First Court of Appeals Clerk, Fourteenth Court of Appeals
First Court of Appeals Fourteenth Court of Appeals
301 Fannin Street, Room 208 301 Fannin Street, Room 208
Houston, Texas 77002-2066 Houston, Texas 77002-2066
/s/ Ann E. Knight
Ann E. Knight
5
Maxim Crane Works, L.P. v. Berkel & Company Contractors, Inc.
Combined Opinion