FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 03 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE GRIMALDI, No. 14-56888
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-03729-JVS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
K. HOLLAND,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 27, 2016**
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Jose Grimaldi appeals from the district court’s
judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to exhaust, see
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Rhoades v. Henry, 638 F.3d 1027, 1034 (9th Cir. 2010), and we vacate and
remand.
Grimaldi contends that the district court erred in dismissing his habeas
petition as unexhausted because it had discretion to stay the proceedings. After the
district court dismissed Grimaldi’s petition, this court held in Mena v. Long, 813
F.3d 907, 912 (9th Cir. 2016), that “a district court has the discretion to stay and
hold in abeyance fully unexhausted petitions under the circumstances set forth in
Rhines [v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005)].” We, therefore, vacate and remand for the
district court to determine in the first instance whether Grimaldi is entitled to a stay
and for any further proceedings.
We express no opinion as to the merits of Grimaldi’s claims, or whether the
procedural requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) are satisfied or Grimaldi is entitled
to equitable tolling.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
VACATED and REMANDED.
2 14-56888