Guadalupe Ortiz-Sandoval v. Loretta Lynch

Case: 15-60395 Document: 00513708769 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/06/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 15-60395 FILED Summary Calendar October 6, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk GUADALUPE ORTIZ-SANDOVAL, Petitioner v. LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A077 180 164 Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: * Guadalupe Ortiz-Sandoval petitions this court to review the administrative reinstatement of her prior order of removal. She challenges the determination by the immigration judge under 8 C.F.R. § 208.31 that she lacked a reasonable fear of persecution or torture in Mexico. According to Ortiz-Sandoval, she showed under § 208.31(c) that she belonged to a particular social group comprised of her family members. She did not exhaust this claim * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 15-60395 Document: 00513708769 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/06/2016 No. 15-60395 administratively, however, and we lack jurisdiction to consider it. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1); Hernandez-De La Cruz v. Lynch, 819 F.3d 784, 786 (5th Cir. 2016). Additionally, because the underlying order of removal rests on Ortiz- Sandoval’s prior conviction for an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), we lack jurisdiction to consider her challenge to the finding that she failed to show a link between the Zetas and Mexican public officials as required to show torture under 8 C.F.R. § 208.18(a)(1). See § 1252(a)(2)(C); Hernandez-De La Cruz, 819 F.3d at 786-87. We need not reach her challenge to the alternate determination that a fear of being killed is not a fear of torture. The petition for review is DISMISSED. 2