Altshuler Shaham Provident Funds, Ltd. v. GML Tower LLC

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 557 CA 10-01745 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ. ALTSHULER SHAHAM PROVIDENT FUNDS, LTD., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GML TOWER LLC, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, THE PIKE COMPANY, INC., THE HAYNER HOYT CORPORATION AND SYRACUSE MERIT ELECTRIC, A DIVISION OF O’CONNELL ELECTRIC CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. HANCOCK & ESTABROOK, SYRACUSE, AND TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, NEW YORK CITY, D’AGOSTINO, LEVINE, LANDESMAN & LEDERMAN, LLP, SPECIAL APPELLATE COUNSEL, NEW YORK CITY (BRUCE H. LEDERMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. GILBERTI STINZIANO HEINTZ & SMITH PC, SYRACUSE, HAHN LOESER & PARKS LLP, CLEVELAND, OHIO (TIMOTHY M. BITTEL, OF THE OHIO AND FLORIDA BARS, ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE, OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT THE HAYNER HOYT CORPORATION. PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP, ROCHESTER (MARK J. MORETTI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT THE PIKE COMPANY, INC. BYRNE, COSTELLO & PICKARD, P.C., SYRACUSE (JORDAN R. PAVLUS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT SYRACUSE MERIT ELECTRIC, A DIVISION OF O’CONNELL ELECTRIC CO., INC. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered May 20, 2010. The order granted the motions of defendants The Pike Company, Inc., The Hayner Hoyt Corporation and Syracuse Merit Electric, a Division of O’Connell Electric Co., Inc., for summary judgment. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Altshuler Shaham Provident Funds, Ltd. v GML Tower, LLC, 28 Misc 3d 475). We add only that we do not address plaintiff’s contention that the 2007 Loan Agreement was a preliminary agreement that expired before the mortgage at issue was filed. That contention is raised for the first time on appeal and “ ‘could have been obviated -2- 557 CA 10-01745 or cured by factual showings or legal countersteps’ ” in Supreme Court (Oram v Capone, 206 AD2d 839, 840). Entered: April 29, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court