UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6937
RAHEEM AKBAR SHABAZZ FLOYD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EDWARD J. MCMAHON, Sheriff; M. J. MOSALL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:15-ct-03309-FL)
Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 18, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raheem Akbar Shabazz Floyd, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Raheem Akbar Shabazz Floyd seeks to appeal the district
court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) for
failing to allege a constitutional violation. This court may
exercise jurisdiction over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012),
and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292
(2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Floyd seeks to
appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local
Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to
the district court with instructions to allow Floyd to file an
amended complaint. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc.,
807 F.3d 619, 623-24, 630 (4th Cir. 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
2