United States v. Jan Stevens

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6610 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JAN STEVENS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:10-cr-00446-LO-3) Submitted: October 20, 2016 Decided: November 3, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jan Stevens, Appellant Pro Se. Kellen Sean Dwyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jan Stevens appeals the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motion to correct a clerical error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Stevens, No. 1:10-cr-00446-LO-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 18, 2016). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2