State v. Marquez

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. NO. 34,600 5 LATRICIA MARQUEZ, 6 Defendant-Appellant. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY 8 Cindy M. Mercer, District Judge 9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM 11 for Appellee 12 Jack Bennett Jacks 13 Albuquerque, NM 14 for Appellant 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, 3 and the time for doing so has expired. 4 {2} Affirmed. 5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 _______________________________________ 8 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 9 WE CONCUR: 10 11 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 12 13 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 2