Peterson v. Baca

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 LORRAINE DELORES PETERSON, 3 Petitioner-Appellee, 4 v. No. 35,105 5 JULIANNA E. BACA, 6 Respondent-Appellant. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY 8 David K. Thomson, District Judge 9 Sommer, Udall, Hardwick, Ahern & Hyatt, P.A. 10 Kurt A. Sommer 11 Joseph P. Walsh 12 Santa Fe, NM 13 for Appellee 14 Julianna E. Baca 15 Albuquerque, NM 16 Pro Se Appellant 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 SUTIN, Judge. 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 4 {2} AFFIRMED. 5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 __________________________________ 7 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 _______________________________ 10 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 11 _______________________________ 12 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 2